تبليغاتX
روانشناسی اجتماعی

روانشناسی اجتماعی

Self-Concept and Self-Esteem

Citation: Huitt, W. (2004). Self-concept and self-esteem. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved [date], from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/regsys/self.html


Return to: | The Regulatory System | Educational Psychology Interactive |


By self, we generally mean the conscious reflection of one's own being or identity, as an object separate from other or from the environment. There are a variety of ways to think about the self. Two of the most widely used terms are self-concept and self-esteem. Self-concept is the cognitive or thinking aspect of self (related to one's self-image) and generally refers to

"the totality of a complex, organized, and dynamic system of learned beliefs, attitudes and opinions that each person holds to be true about his or her personal existence" (Purkey, 1988).

Self-esteem is the affective or emotional aspect of self and generally refers to how we feel about or how we value ourselves (one's self-worth). Self-concept can also refer to the general idea we have of ourselves and self-esteem can refer to particular measures about components of self-concept. Some authors even use the two terms interchangeably.

Franken (1994) states that

"there is a great deal of research which shows that the self-concept is, perhaps, the basis for all motivated behavior. It is the self-concept that gives rise to possible selves, and it is possible selves that create the motivation for behavior" (p. 443).

This supports the idea that one's paradigm or world view and one's relationship to that view provide the boundaries and circumstances within which we develop our vision about possibilities. This is one of the major issues facing children and youth today (Huitt, 2004).

Franken (1994) suggests that self-concept is related to self-esteem in that

"people who have good self-esteem have a clearly differentiated self-concept.... When people know themselves they can maximize outcomes because they know what they can and cannot do" (p. 439).

It would seem, then, that one way to impact self-esteem is to obey the somewhat outworn cliche of "Know thyself."

We develop and maintain our self-concept through the process of taking action and then reflecting on what we have done and what others tell us about what we have done. We reflect on what we have done and can do in comparison to our expectations and the expectations of others and to the characteristics and accomplishments of others (Brigham, 1986; James, 1890). That is, self-concept is not innate, but is developed or constructed by the individual through interaction with the environment and reflecting on that interaction. This dynamic aspect of self-concept (and, by corollary, self-esteem) is important because it indicates that it can be modified or changed. Franken (1994) states

"there is a growing body of research which indicates that it is possible to change the self-concept. Self-change is not something that people can will but rather it depends on the process of self-reflection. Through self-reflection, people often come to view themselves in a new, more powerful way, and it is through this new, more powerful way of viewing the self that people can develop possible selves" (p. 443).

There are a several different components of self-concept: physical, academic, social, and transpersonal. The physical aspect of self-concept relates to that which is concrete: what we look like, our sex, height, weight, etc.; what kind of clothes we wear; what kind of car we drive; what kind of home we live in; and so forth. Our academic self-concept relates to how well we do in school or how well we learn. There are two levels: a general academic self-concept of how good we are overall and a set of specific content-related self-concepts that describe how good we are in math, science, language arts, social science, etc. The social self-concept describes how we relate to other people and the transpersonal self-concept describes how we relate to the supernatural or unknowns.

Marsh (1992) showed that the relationship of self-concept to school achievement is very specific. General self-concept and non-academic aspects of self-concept are not related to academic work; general academic achievement measures are related moderately to academic success. Specific measures of subject-related self-concepts are highly related to success in that content area.

Using linear discriminant analysis, Byrne (1990) showed that academic self-concept was more effective than was academic achievement in differentiating between low-track and high-track students. Hamachek (1995) also asserts that self-concept and school achievement and school achievement are related. The major issue is the direction of the relationship: does self-concept produce achievement or does achievement produce self-concept. Gage and Berliner (1992) state

"the evidence is accumulating, however, to indicate that level of school success, particularly over many years, predicts level of regard of self and one's own ability (Bridgeman & Shipman, 1978; Kifer, 1975); whereas level of self-esteem does not predict level of school achievement. The implication is that teachers need to concentrate on the academic successes and failures of their students. It is the student's history of success and failure that gives them the information with which to assess themselves" (p. 159).

If academic achievement leads to self-concept/self-esteem, but self-concept is a better predictor of being a low-track or high-track student, it would appear that there is some intervening variable. James (1890) states that the intervening variable is personal expectations. His formula is:

Self-esteem = Success / Pretensions.

That is, increasing self-esteem results when success is improved relative to expectations. Bandura (1997) states that one's self-efficacy is one of the best predictions of successful achievement. He also states that one's mastery experiences related to success is the major influence on one's self-efficacy. As self-efficacy and self-esteem are both constructed by one's conscious reflections, it would appear that educators and parents should provide experiences that students can master rather than attempting to boost self-esteem directly through other means.

An interesting corollary to this equation is that success is limited by expectations and self-esteem:

Success = Pretensions * Self-esteem.

This equation states that success, especially the limits of one's success, can be improved by increasing expectations and/or self-esteem. However, as noted by Gage and Berliner (1992), the research on the relationship between self-esteem/self-concept and school achievement suggests that measures of general or even academic self-concept are not significantly related to school achievement. It is at the level of very specific subjects (e.g., reading, mathematics, science) that there is a relationship between self-concept/self-esteem and academic success. Given the above formula, this suggests that success in a particular subject area is not really changing one's self-concept (knowledge of one's self) or even self-esteem (one's subjective evaluation of one's value or worth), but rather is impacting one's expecation about future success based on one's past experience.

Seligman's (1996) work on explanatory style suggests that the intervening variable connecting self-esteem and achievement is the student's level of "optimism" or the tendency to see the world as a benevolent (good things will probably happen) or malevolent (bad things will probably happen).

Some additional "self" terms are self-direction (Smith, 2004) and self-determination (Ryan & Deci, 2000; the extent to which one's aspirations, dreams, and goals are self-selected), self-regulation (Bandura, 1997; Behncke, 2003; one's guidance of one's goal-directed thinking, attitudes, and behavior), and self-transcendence (Polanyi, 1970; Frankl, 1963;  going beyond or above the limitations of one's ego; meaningful connections to others, nature, universe, Creator, etc.). My view is that we need to address all of these constructions in a holistic manner if we are to prepare our children and youth for successful adulthood (Huitt, 2004).

References

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  • Behncke, L. (2002). Self-regulation: A brief review. Athletic Insight, 14(1). Retrieved November 2004, from http://www.athleticinsight.com/Vol4Iss1/SelfRegulation.htm
  • Brigham, J. (1986). Social psychology. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
  • Byrne, B. (1990). Self-concept and academic achievement: Investigating their importance as discriminators of academic track membership in high school. Canadian Journal of Education, 15(2), 173-182.
  • Franken, R. (1994). Human motivation (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
  • Frankl, V. (1963). (I. Lasch, Trans.). Man's search for meaning:  An introduction to logotherapy. New York: Washington Square Press
  • Gage, N., & Berliner, D. (1992). Educational psychology (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Hamachek, D. (1995). Self-concept and school achievement: Interaction dynamics and a tool for assessing the self-concept component. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73(4), 419-425.
  • Huitt, W. (2004, October 29). Becoming a Brilliant Star: An introduction. Presentation at the Forum for Integrated Education and Educational Reform sponsored by the Council for Global Integrative Education, Santa Cruz, CA. Available on at http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/brilstar/chapters/BrilStarintro.pdf
  • James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.
  • Marsh, H. (1992 ). The content specificity of relations between academic self-concept and achievement: An extension of the Marsh/Shavelson model. ERIC NO: ED349315.
  • Polanyi, M. (1970). Transcendence and self-transcendence. Soundings, 53(1), 88-94. Retrieved November 2004, from http://www.compilerpress.atfreeweb.com/Anno%20Polanyi%20Transcendence%201970.htm
  • Purkey, W. (1988). An overview of self-concept theory for counselors. ERIC Clearinghouse on Counseling and Personnel Services, Ann Arbor, Mich. (An ERIC/CAPS Digest: ED304630)
  • Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. Retrieved November 2004, from http://psych.rochester.edu/SDT/measures/documents/2000RyanDeciSDT.pdf
  • Seligman, M. (1996) The optimistic child: How learned optimism protects children from depression. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Smith, M. (2004). Self-direction. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education. Retrieved November 2004, from http://www.infed.org/biblio/b-selfdr.htm

| Internet Resources | Electronic Files | Additional articles | Additional books |


Return to: | The Regulatory System | Educational Psychology Interactive |

+ نوشته شده در  پنجشنبه یازدهم خرداد 1385ساعت 9:54  توسط علی  | 

The Child's Self Concept: OK or NOT OK

Author: Betsy Schenck, Extension Specialist, Retired, Virginia State University

Recommended by: Dr. Peggy O. Harrelson, Extension Specialist, Child Development, Virginia State University

Publication Number 350-661, September 1996

Table of Contents

The Child's Self Concept is the Way He Feels About Himself

How Can Adults Help?

Recommended Reading

The Child's Self-Concept Is the Way He Feels About Himself

The child can feel OK or NOT OK

A child feels good about himself (his self-concept is OK) when he sees himself as:
  • Accepted by others
  • Competent
  • Confident
  • Secure
  • Loved
  • Valued
  • Moral
  • Independent
  • Accepting of himself

A child who feels good about himself is satisfied with life and thinks the world is a pretty good place to live in.

A good self-concept enables a child to accept responsibility, to achieve success in school, and to grow into a productive member of society. His view of life is, I'm OK-You're OK.

A child who does not have good feelings about himself may see himself as:

  • Rejected by others
  • Incompetent
  • Doubted by self
  • Insecure
  • Unloved
  • Unwanted
  • Bad
  • Dependent
  • Dislikes self
A child who doesn't feel good about himself-his self-concept is NOT OK- is dissatisfied with life and thinks the world is not a good place to live in. He feels "I'm NOT OK."

A poor self-concept leads to difficulty in accepting responsibility, fear, apathy, anxiety, defensiveness, and lack of success in school. It may lead to juvenile delinquency and excessive use of alcohol and drugs.


Areas that Influence the Child's Self-Concept

What adults do and say to the child

A child feels OK when adults give:

  • Smiles
  • Pats
  • Hugs
  • Kind words
  • Encouragement

A child feels NOT OK when adults give:

  • Slaps
  • Scowls
  • Humiliating remarks
  • Discouragement

Child-rearing methods used

A child feels OK when parents are: supportive, give choices, and use democratic methods.

A child feels NOT OK when parents are too strict or too permissive.

What adults expect of the child

A child feels OK when what adults expect of her is in line with her abilities.

A child feels NOT OK when adults expect too much or too little of her.

Special privileges, praise, and punishment given to the child

A child feels OK when they are fair and appropriate.

A child feels NOT OK when they are unfair, too much, or too little.

Amount of attention given the child

A child feels OK when her needs for love, security, and belonging are met.

A child feels NOT OK when she gets too little attention and feels neglected and unwanted.


Ways We Tell How Children Feel About Themselves

Signs that the child feels OK about herself are:

  • Happy facial expression
  • Easy, alert body posture
  • Warm voice
  • Language-pleasant
  • No nervous habits
  • Accepts others
  • Faces new situations easily
  • Knows how to handle angry, unhappy feelings

Signs that the child feels NOT OK about himself are:

  • Sad or hostile expression
  • Slumped or tense body posture
  • Whiny voice
  • Insulting language
  • Nervous habits: hair twisting, nail biting, clothes twisting.
  • Withdraws from others
  • Extremely frightened of new situations
  • Frequently expresses angry and unhappy feelings with aggressive acts.

Return to Table of Contents


How Can Adults Help?

The self-concept is learned. Since it is learned, adults have the responsibility of helping children develop healthy views of themselves. Dr. Harris said in his book, I'm OKم You're OK, "Fortunate are the children who are helped early in life to find they are OK by repeated exposure to situations in which they can prove, to themselves, their own worth and the worth of others."


Build the child's sense of basic trust.

Let him know that you accept, respect, and trust him and seek to earn his acceptance, respect, and trust. Adults are able to exert a positive influence on the development of the child's self-concept only if they are valued by the child.

Learn why the child acts the way he does.

Is he jealous of the new baby? Tired and irritable? Frustrated by a too difficult task? Bored?

Be yourself.

Accept your own feelings about yourself and about your child. Don't be afraid of damaging children by occasionially "losing your cool." Children can withstand some bad experiences without suffering damaging consequences to their self-concepts. However, if adults continually "lose their cool" and display negative attitudes, they need to examine their own emotional health.

Express your unpleasant feelings verbally.

Rather than bottle up feelings until they explode, tell the child how you feel. For example, say "It upsets me when you dump the box of cornflakes on the kitchen floor." However, try to express your feelings in a quiet voice. Have a "cooling off" periodمwait until you have calmed downمbefore you tell the child about how you feel. (Do not express anger; it scares the child).

Accept the child's unpleasant emotions.

The child needs to know that everyone has angry, unhappy feelings at times. We can't help how we feel, but we can help how we express our feelings. Bad feelings need not give her a concept of herself as "bad."

Teach the child how to deal with angry, unhappy feelings.

Children need to learn to express their feelings in socially acceptable ways. "Bad" feelings may be expressed through words. A child can say, "That hurts" when another child hits him. Teach him to express how he feels, not what he thinks of the other person. Help the child get rid of his "bad" feeling through vigorous activity: running, digging, pounding nails; playing in sand or water; or activities with finger paints and clay help ease tensions.

Provide ways for the child to feel successful.

Give her jobs which aren't too easy or too difficult. A three-year old can be very proud of herself when she sets the table for mother. When the child feels that she is a capable and competent person she has good feelings about herself.

Respond to the child's actions immediately.

If the child performs a job well, tell him so right away, not next week. Praise the act, not the person. Say "You certainly did a good job of setting the table," not "You are such a good boy." If the child behaves well on a trip to the grocery store, tell him so immediately. Say "You were very helpful today when we went to the grocery store." He is much more likely to repeat desired behavior if he receives immediate recognition.

Teach and demonstrate respect for your own & other cultures & ethnic groups.

Children from ethnic minorities and lower socio-economic groups, children with handicaps, and females need special attention from caring adults in order to prevent them from developing the idea that certain opportunities or activities are not open to them. Help children to feel pride in their cultural background and accept those from different backgrounds. Also, help children learn about other subcultures in our society. Unless taught otherwise, children think everybody lives just like they do. A growing esteem of others is basic to a healthy self-esteem.

Give the child plenty of praise, warmth, & physical signs of affection.

Children thrive in a climate of love. They need lots of "warm fuzzies"- pats, smiles, hugs, and praise. Feelings of acceptance and love are necessary for a healthy self- concept.

Encourage exploration.

Give the child as many different experiences as possible-visits to the grocery store, to see grandmother, to the park, to the library, to the fire station. Give him opportunities to test his body- climbing, running, jumping. The more varied a child's experience, the more opportunities he has for developing concepts of himself as a person who says "I can" rather than "I can't."

Take photographs of the child.

Let him compare his size in photographs one or two years apart.

Display the child's artwork.

Tape her picture on the refrigerator door or the kitchen wall. Let her know that you value her creations.


"Feelings are built up over a period of years . . . If, on the whole, day after day and month after month, the child experiences more comfort than discomfort, more balance than imbalance, more attention than lack of it, his feelings will be in the direction of seeing himself and the world on the 'OK' side of the ledger.*"

If all children are helped to develop a positive self-concept, the course of the world could be changed for the better.

Return to Table of Contents


Recommended Reading

Axline, V. Dibs-In Search of Self. New York: Ballantine, 1964.

Bateman, C. Fred. Empowering Your Child. Norfolk, VA: Hampton Roads Publishing Co., 1990.

Ellkind, David. The Hurried Child. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1981.

Ellkind, David. Miseducation: Preschoolers at Risk. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1987.

Fraiberg, S. H. The Magic Years. New York: Scribner's, 1959.

Galinsky, Ellen and David, Judy. The Pre-School Years. New York: Ballentine Books. 1988.

Lieberman, Alicia. The Emotional Life of the Toddler. New York: Free Press, The Division of MacMillan, Inc., 1993.

Shiff, Eileen, Ed. Experts Advise Parents: A Guide to Raising Loving Responsible Children. New York: Delacorte Press, 1987.

Return to Table of Contents

Visit Virginia Cooperative Extension

+ نوشته شده در  پنجشنبه یازدهم خرداد 1385ساعت 9:48  توسط علی  | 

 

A SELF CONCEPT-BASED MODEL OF WORK MOTIVATION

 

NANCY H. LEONARD
Assistant Professor
College of Business
Administration
University of Evansville
1800 Lincoln Avenue

LAURA LYNN BEAUVAIS
Associate Professor
Department of Management
University of Rhode Island
Kingston, RI 02881-0802
RICHARD W. SCHOLL
Professor of Management
Director of Graduate Programs
Department of Management
University of Rhode Island
Kingston, RI 02881-0802
 

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces a unifying model of work motivation based on theories of self concept that have been proposed in the sociological and psychological literatures. Traditional theories of work motivation are reviewed, the model is presented, and used to link sources of motivation to organizational inducement systems.
 
INTRODUCTION

There is a growing realization that traditional models of motivation do not explain the diversity of behavior found in organizational settings. While research and theory building in the areas of goal setting, reward systems, leadership, and job design have advanced our understanding of organizational behavior, most of this work is built on the premise that individuals act in ways to maximize the value of exchange with the organization. In addition, some researchers have called attention to the role of dispositions and volitional processes in models of motivation (Kanfer, 1990). Others point out that we have a variety of motivation theories that have no unifying theme and are not supported well by the research (Locke & Henne 1986). In an effort to address these issues, some researchers have turned to self theory as an alternative explanation for organizational behavior. Specifically, social identity theory (Stryker, 1980, 1986; Tajfel & Turner, 1985), self presentation theory (Beach & Mitchell, 1990; Gergen, 1968; Schlenker, 1985), and self efficacy theory (Bandura, 1982, 1986), are all fundamentally rooted in the concept of self.

In this paper, we introduce a unifying model of motivation based on theories of self concept that have been proposed in the sociological and psychological literatures. We will begin by reviewing some traditional theories of motivation, specifically concentrating on their limitations with regard to external validity and generalizability across situations. Then we will present a comprehensive model that proposes the self concept as the underlying force that energizes, directs and sustains behavior across a wide variety of situations. We will discuss how the self concept influences behavior in organizations and present a typology of sources of motivation which can be used as a unifying framework based on the self concept. We will conclude with managerial implications and suggestions for future research.
 

WHY A SELF CONCEPT-BASED MODEL OF WORK MOTIVATION IS NEEDED 

There have been a number of attempts at developing models of self concept-based motivation, but none as yet have been integrated into the mainstream of organizational research and teaching (Brief & Aldag, 1981; Gecas, 1982,1986; Korman, 1970; Schlenker, 1985; Shamir, 1991). Most organizational behavior textbooks provide only a cursory overview of self-based constructs. What is missing is a model of the self concept that clearly defines these constructs and explains how they can be integrated with traditional work motivation models. After reviewing the literature on motivation, we have determined that there are four major reasons why we need the addition of self concept-based constructs to more completely understand and predict organizational behavior. Specifically, these four reasons are: (1) the need to explain non-calculative-based work behavior; (2) the need to better account for internal sources of motivation; (3) the need to integrate dispositional and situational explanations of behavior; and (4) the need to integrate existing self-based theories in the literature.

Need to Explain Non-Calculative-Based Work Behavior. Most of our currently popular theories of work motivation assume that individuals are "rational maximizer(s) of personal utility" (Shamir, 1990, p. 39). For example, expectancy theory assumes that motivation is a result of calculatively determined probabilities associated with different levels or types of behavior and the valences of the outcomes associated with these behaviors. Equity theory may be considered calculative insofar as it assumes that people cognitively assess their own attitudes and job performance by comparing their input/outcome ratio to that of a referent other. If this ratio indicates an imbalance between inputs and rewards as compared to the referent, then inequity is produced. This inequity causes cognitive dissonance that the individual is motivated to reduce. These cognitive choice or calculative models assume that behaviors are the result of hedonistic processes (i.e., people will behave in ways that maximize positive outcomes and minimize negative outcomes).

Although research over the past twenty years in decision-making, occupational choice, and achievement motivation (see Kanfer, 1990, for a review of this literature) has provided strong support for these calculative models, they cannot account for the full range of motivated behavior. For example, these models do not explain changes in behavior across situations when expectancies and valences remain constant (Atkinson & Birch, 1970). In addition, individuals may differ in the use of expectancy and instrumentality information (Rynes & Lawler, 1983). Self theory supplements calculative models by suggesting the concept of self as a basis for non-calculative explanations of behavior.

Need to Account for Internal Sources of Motivation. There are a number of theories that attempt to capture types or sources of motivation affecting organizational members. For instance, in discussing internal and external causes of behavior, deCharms (1968) suggested the dichotomy of intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation to characterize the different loci of causality. Intrinsically motivated behaviors (i.e., those behaviors that occur in the absence of external controls) are said to represent internal causality, whereas behaviors that are induced by external forces are said to represent external causality. Deci (1975) explored the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation and in doing so, tried to shed some light on the meaning of intrinsic motivation. He suggested that intrinsically motivated behaviors fall into two categories. The first category includes behaviors that individuals engage in to seek out challenging situations. These challenges represent incongruities between stimuli and comparison standards. The second category includes behaviors aimed at reducing these incongruities (i.e., overcoming challenges). Thus, intrinsically motivated behavior, according to Deci, is conceptualized as a continual process of seeking and overcoming challenges.

Another understanding of intrinsic motivation is offered by Katz and Kahn (1978). They argue that the bases of motivation can be categorized in terms of legal compliance, external rewards (i.e., instrumental satisfaction), and internalized motivation. Internalized motivation is further broken down into self-expression, derived directly from role performance and internalized values, resulting when group or organizational goals become incorporated into the value system of the individual. Etzioni (1975) takes a similar view when arguing that organizations induce involvement from their members by one of three means: alienative, calculative, or moral. Alienative and calculative involvement are explained by exchange processes. Moral involvement is more complex. According to Etzioni, there are two kinds of moral involvement, pure and social. Pure moral involvement is the result of internalization of norms, while social involvement results from sensitivity to pressures of primary groups and their members. Moral involvement is not based on expected satisfaction of needs and may even demand the denial of need satisfaction and the sacrifice of personal pleasure. For example, military personnel who serve in the armed forces demonstrate the value of serving one's country to the point of risking their lives, and the individual who works a double shift for a friend who needs the night off demonstrates the value of friendship. In these instances, the consequence of acting in line with one's internalized values is not a sense of pleasure or need fulfillment, but rather a sense of affirmation attained when the person abides by his or her moral commitments.

The above approaches are strikingly similar in that they allow for both an instrumental, or exchange basis of motivation, and an expressive basis of motivation, whether it is termed intrinsic motivation, intrinsically motivated behavior, moral involvement, or internalized motivation. This paper is concerned with clarifying our understanding of expressive motivation by integrating these different approaches in a model of the self concept.

Need to Integrate Dispositional and Situational Explanations of Behavior. Psychologists have long postulated that individual dispositions or personalities are significant determinants of behavior. The assumptions underlying this approach are that (1) there are individual differences in ways of behaving; (2) individual behavior is somewhat stable over time; and (3) individual behavior is somewhat consistent across situations (Pervin, 1975). At the other extreme is the view that behavior is determined by situational factors and that similarity in behavior results from similarity of situational circumstances. Supporting this latter view, Mischel (1968) argued that personality traits have accounted for little variance in behavior across situations. Recently, some researchers have begun to provide new evidence for the dispositional view. For example, Staw and Ross (1985) found in a longitudinal study, that job attitudes were significantly stable over a five year period and that there was significant cross-situational consistency when individuals changed occupations and/or employers. Gerhardt (1987) replicated these findings using a younger sample of both men and women and a more sophisticated methodology that controlled for job complexity. Arvey, Bouchard, Segal, and Abraham (1989) have even provided evidence for a genetic disposition in the determination of job satisfaction.

Today, most researchers have taken an interactionist view that states that behavior is a function of both environment and personality (Mitchell & James, 1989; Pervin, 1989). Specifically, these researchers are suggesting that a dynamic reciprocal interaction occurs between the person and the situation. Pervin challenges researchers to develop models that will explain how people are able to shift from situation to situation, often exhibiting different patterns of behavior, while still retaining a recognizable personality structure. To meet Pervin's challenge, the self-concept model proposed in this paper provides a way of explaining both consistency and variability in individual work behavior across situations.

Need to Integrate Existing Self-Based Theories. In recent years, a plethora of self-based theories have been proposed (Korman, 1970; Markus & Wurf, 1987; Schlenker, 1985; Shamir, 1991; Snyder & Williams, 1982). All of these theories are based on the assumption that "human beings have a fundamental need to maintain or enhance the phenomenal self" (Snyder & Williams, 1982, p. 258). Because of this fundamental need, individuals are motivated to behave in ways that are consistent with existing self-perceptions. Thus, these theories may be useful in expanding our notion of motivated behavior in the workplace.

Unfortunately, because of the different streams of research in this area, our knowledge of self theory is piecemeal in nature and highly disorganized. Further, a proliferation of terms and concepts that often overlap in meaning has resulted. What is needed is an integrative model of the self-concept that will clarify the nature of self theory constructs and organize them in a nomological net that will guide empirical research.

If self theory is to be useful to organizational researchers, it must do a number of things. First, it must provide a detailed description of the structure and content of the self concept and an understanding of how it is developed. Second, it must address how the self concept influences behavior in organizations. Third, it must explain how the self concept affects employee reactions to organizational systems that are in place to induce specific behaviors (e.g., reward systems, cultural systems, etc.). We will begin with an overview of the self concept in terms of structural components and developmental processes.
 

STRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE SELF CONCEPT

In a recent review, Markus & Wurf (1987) state that the most dramatic advances in the last decade of research on the self concept can be found in work on its structure and content. Historically, one of the major stumbling blocks to linking the self concept to behavior has been the view of the self concept as a stable, generalized, or average view of the self. More recent research in social psychology (Greenwald & Pratkanis, 1984; Schlenker, 1980) has resolved this problem by conceptualizing of the self concept as a multifaceted phenomenon composed of a set of images, schemas and prototypes (Markus & Wurf, 1987). There has been a similar movement in sociology where the self is defined in terms of multiple identities (Schlenker, 1985; Stryker, 1980). Identities include personal characteristics, features and experiences, as well as roles and social statuses. In both streams of research, authors define the self concept in terms of various self-representations. Their work indicates that some self-representations are more important than others (Schlenker, 1980, 1984); some are representations of what the self is perceived to be, versus what the self would like to be (Markus & Wurf, 1987); some are core conceptions (Gergen, 1968) or salient identities (Stryker, 1980, 1986) while others are more peripheral; and some are relatively stable (Sullivan, 1989) while others are dynamic (Markus & Wurf, 1987).

In the self concept-based model of motivation which we are proposing, one's concept of self is composed of four interrelated self-perceptions: the perceived self, the ideal self, one's self esteem, and a set of social identities. Each of these elements plays a crucial role in understanding how the self concept relates to energizing, directing and sustaining organizational behavior. Each of these self-representations will be described and their interrelationships discussed.

The Perceived Self
Most models and descriptions of the self involve elements of self perceptions; however, most are unclear as to what aspects of the self the individual holds perceptions of. One of the earliest theorists writing on the nature of the self was William James (1890). He saw the self as consisting of whatever the individual views as belonging to himself or herself, which includes a material, a social, and a spiritual self. The perceptions of the material self are those of one's own body, family, and possessions. The social self includes the views others have of the individual, and the spiritual includes perceptions of one's emotions and desires. Kihlstrom, Cantor, and their associates suggest that individuals hold perceptions of themselves in terms of traits and values (Kihlstrom & Cantor, 1984), their attributes, experiences, thoughts and actions (Cantor & Kihlstrom, 1985; 1987), and their physical appearance, demographic attributes and dispositions of various sorts (Kihlstrom, Cantor, Albright, Chew, Klein & Niedenthal, 1988). Gecas (1982) asserts that the content of the self concept consists of perceptions of social and personal identities, traits, attributes, and possessions.

The model which we propose utilizes three general categories of self-perceptions which we believe incorporate most of those suggested in earlier research. These include traits, com-petencies and values.

Traits. Traits are labels for broad reaction tendencies and express relatively permanent patterns of behavior (Cattell, 1965). Fundamental to this definition is the assumption that people make internal attributions to individuals who demonstrate a particular behavior pattern in different situations or at different times without apparent external reasons. The more cross-situational consistency one observes, and the more external causes of behavior seem to be lacking, the more likely one would make an internal or dispositional attribution (Harvey, Kelley, & Shapiro, 1957). It is not important at this point to understand what really motivates aggressive behavior. What is important is that individuals hold a set of self perceptions regarding many different traits.

Competencies. A second element in the perceived self is competencies. Individuals hold perceptions of what skills, abilities, talents, and knowledge they possess. These can range from very specific skills, such as the ability to run a turret lathe, to more general competencies, such as the leadership skills to create and manage change.

Values. Values are defined as concepts and beliefs about desirable end states or behaviors that transcend specific situations, guide selection or evaluation of behavior and events, and are ordered by relative importance (Schwartz & Bilsky, 1990). Individuals demonstrate certain values through their speech and actions. This element of the perceived self is concerned with the set of values that the individual believes guides his or her decisions and actions.

An individual's perception of his/her attributes (i.e., traits, competencies, and values), can be describe in terms of two separate dimensions, level and strength. Level of self perception refers to the degree to which the individual perceives he/she possesses this attribute. Does the individual see himself or herself as highly introverted (trait), or a very good tennis player (competency), or a hard worker (value)? This dimension deals with the issue of where individuals see themselves, relative to their ideal selves, and is directly related to the issue of high and low self esteem. (The components of ideal self and self esteem will be described shortly.)

When determining the level of an attribute, individuals use two types of evaluative frames of reference. An ordinal standard or frame of reference is used when the individual rates or compares himself or herself to others (i.e., how good is he or she relative to others). To be first or the best is the ultimate criterion when using this type of standard. An individual may also use a fixed standard, whereby he/she rates or evaluates attributes against a goal or predetermined metric or criterion (i.e., to earn a bachelors' degree). This may take the form of reaching a set of internalized goals or timetables.

The second dimension of the perceived self is the strength of the perception, and refers to how strongly the individual holds the perception of attribute level. Individuals with strong perceived selves are relatively firm in their perceptions of an attribute level. These strong perceptions of self are a result of consistent and clear feedback regarding the attribute. A weak perceived self is reflected in individuals who are relatively unsure of an attribute level, often resulting from conflicting or ambiguous feedback regarding the attribute. How these self per-ceptions develop is explained next.

Development of Perceived Self. Self perceptions are determined through interaction with one's environment. Processes of attitude formation, attitude change, (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1980) and self attribution (Jones, 1990) all contribute to the development of a set of self perceptions. As indicated above, when feedback is unambiguous, plentiful, and consistent, a set of strongly held self perceptions is formed. Ambiguous, lacking, or inconsistent feedback results in weakly held self perceptions.

Two primary forms of information one receives about the self from the environment come in the form of task feedback and social feedback. Task feedback comes directly from observation of the results of one's efforts on different task activities. Completion of a project, accomplishment of a goal, and winning a competition are all forms of task feedback. Social feedback is probably the most prevalent type of feedback one receives regarding his or her traits, competencies, and values. It is the feedback one derives from the behavior and communication, verbal and non-verbal, of others.

The link between social feedback and the perceived self is grounded in the process of attribution. As people seek to understand the behavior of a particular individual, they make certain attributions as to the causes of patterns of behavior they observe in that individual (Jones & Nisbitt, 1971; Kelley, 1971). Under certain conditions, observers make internal or dispositional attributions, mostly in the form of traits, competencies, or values, and these internal attributions become the basis for self perceptions. These attributions are communi-cated to the person in a number of ways, both directly and indirectly. Attributions may be communicated directly in the form of written or oral evaluation, praise, reprimand, or recognition. For example, direct feedback may be regarding a trait (you're too aggressive), a competency (you're an excellent teacher), or a value (you're an honest person). In addition, attributions are communicated indirectly in a number of ways. An evaluative statement regarding a project or task for which the individual feels responsible is an example of indirect social feedback. Other types of indirect social feedback come in the form of inclusion or non-inclusion of the individual by group members in their activities, the bestowing of positions of status on the individual, and when others accept or fail to accept an individual's influence by acting or failing to act on his or her advice, recommendations, or orders. It is important to note that the feedback provider does not have to intend to provide feedback for the feedback receiver to interpret an action as social feedback.

The Ideal Self
While the perceived self describes the set of perceptions individuals hold of their actual traits, competencies, and values, the ideal self represents the set of traits, competencies and values an individual would like to possess (Rogers, 1959). By possess we mean that the individual desires to believe that he/she actually has a particular trait, competency, or value, or wants others to believe that the individual has the trait, competency, or value. This view of ideal self is similar to Schlenker's (1985) "idealized image" (i.e., the ultimate person one would like to be).

Development of the Ideal Self. In the early stages of interaction with a reference group, whether the reference group is the primary group (i.e., the family for a young child) or a secondary group (i.e., one's peers or co-workers), choices and decisions are channeled through the existing social system. As an individual interacts with the reference group, he/she receives feedback from reference group members. If the feedback is positive and unconditional, the individual will internalize the traits, competencies and values which are important to that reference group. In this case, the individual becomes inner-directed, using the internalized traits, competencies and values as a measure of his/her own successes/failures. Internalized competencies and values have been suggested as the basis of the ideal self (Higgins, Klein & Strauman, 1987) and as an internal standard for behavior (Bandura, 1986). If the individual receives negative feedback or positive but conditional feedback, the individual may not internalize or only partially internalize the traits, competencies and values of the reference group. This type of individual becomes other-directed and will either withdraw from the group or seek constant feedback from group members.

Thus, the establishment of the ideal self is determined through a mix of external, or other-directed standards, and internal, or inner-directed standards, depending on one's orientation to the world (Reisman, 1961). The ideal self of the other-directed individual is developed largely through the established norms and role expectations of reference group members. The audience for one's actions becomes the reference group, in that it is important that reference group members see the individual as possessing accepted attributes. For the inner-directed individual, the ideal self is determined largely through the development of a set of internalized goals and standards, and the individual becomes his or her own audience. Gottfredson's (1981) perspective on individual and social achievement motivation is similar to this conceptualization. This latter author asserts that in individually-oriented achievement motivation, the individual strives to achieve some internalized standards of excellence. In contrast, socially-oriented achievement motivation reflects an individual's perseverance to fulfill the expectations of significant others.

Social Identities
According to Ashforth and Mael (1989), social identification is a process by which individuals classify themselves and others into different social categories, such as "woman," "Catholic," and "nurse." This classification process serves the functions of segmenting and ordering the social environment and enabling the individual to locate or define him- or herself in that social environment. Thus, social identification provides a partial answer to the question, "Who am I?" Social identities are thus those aspects of an individual's self-concept that derive from the social categories to which he or she perceives him- or herself as belonging (Tajfel & Turner, 1985).

Development of Social Identities. Individuals establish social identities through involvement with reference groups in social situations. Reference groups provide three major functions with respect to social identities: (1) the determination of the profile of traits, competencies, and values for a particular social identity; (2) the establishment and com-munication of the relative value and status of various social roles or identities; and (3) are the basis of social feedback regarding one's level of these traits, competencies, and values.

Specifically, social identities link individuals to reference groups. These groups establish a set of role expectations and norms which guide the individual's behavior within each of the social identities. For example, the identity of an accountant may be associated with reserve and self control (traits), analytical ability and good memory (competencies), and honesty and free enterprise (values). Individuals who desire to be identified with the reference group will attempt to demonstrate the traits, competencies, and values associated with that identity. These aspired-to traits, competencies, and values serve as the basis for the ideal self. Once established, the attributes then reinforce the identity. The determination of the relevant set of attributes that comprise the identity is not fixed, but rather is the result of an interaction process between individuals and subgroups and members of the relevant reference group. This definition and redefinition of the identity is a constant process (Bandura, 1986; Markus & Wurf, 1987).

Individual's establish at least two types of social identities: a global identity and role-specific identities. The global identity is the identity one wishes to portray across all situations, across various roles, and to various reference groups. The global identity exists independently of any specific social identity. The reference group for the global identity includes those members of one's primary group, and the traits, competencies and values which are relevant to the individual are those which are reinforced by the individual's culture. The global identity is formed early in life, and one's family, functioning as a primary reference group, performs the three functions mentioned above.

The global identity provides a starting point for role-specific identities. As the individual matures, the control of the primary group lessens and the individual begins to establish certain role-specific social identities. Role-specific social identities are those identities established for a specific reference group or a specific social role. It is this process of selecting and "earning" the identity that acts to define one's self to various reference groups. By "earning" the identity, we are describing the process whereby the individual meets basic expectations of the reference group (either formal or informal credentialling) necessary to carry out the role.

As an individual begins to interact with reference group members in a role-specific identity, the global identity provides input to this specific identity. However, as an individual remains in a role-specific identity and receives positive feedback from group members, the role-specific identity begins to provide input to the global identity. The reference groups in these social situations (e.g., one's co-workers, friends, etc.) begin to perform the functions which were previously performed by the primary reference group. The individual is now exposed to the traits, competencies, and values which are valued by each new reference group. The identity-specific reference groups also provide the social feedback important in the development of the perceived self.

Thus, identities may be thought to exist in a hierarchy, starting with the global identity and working through role-specific identities. As reference groups become more specific, the identity becomes more specific, and thus the attributes associated with the identity become more specific. For example, an individual may identify him/herself as an academic at one level, a member of the business administration faculty at another, and a finance professor at yet another level of specificity (Stryker & Serpe, 1982). Roberts and Donahue (1994) provide empirical evidence that individuals do see themselves differently in each of their roles and, in particular, they rate the trait attributes of some roles more highly than the trait attributes of others. They also found that general self perceptions (i.e., global identity) are related to the role-specific self perceptions.

As participation in a social identity continues over time, the reference group itself becomes the basis of identification, and the success or failure of the reference group as a whole becomes a source of feedback for the individual. As defined by social identity theory (Ashforth & Mael, 1989; Tajfel & Turner, 1985), social identification is the perception of oneness with or belonging-ness to a reference group. When an individual identifies with a social referenced group, he/she perceives the fate of the group as his/her own (Foote, 1951; Tolman, 1943). The more an individual identifies with a social identity, the more the individual vests his/her self concept in the identity.

Self Esteem
The self esteem is the evaluative component of the self concept (Gergen, 1971; Rosenberg, 1965). It is a function of the distance between the ideal self and the perceived self. When the perceived self matches the ideal self, self esteem is relatively high. Low self esteem occurs when the perceived self is significantly lower than the ideal self. Since the distance between the ideal and perceived self constantly varies depending on task and social feedback, self esteem is a dynamic component of the self concept and it is always in a state of change and development.

Korman (1970) suggests three types of self esteem: chronic self esteem, which is defined as a relatively persistent personality trait or dispositional state that occurs consistently across various situations; task-specific self esteem, which is one's self perception of his/her competence concerning a particular task or job; and socially-influenced self esteem, which is a function of the expectations of others. Chronic self esteem is the result of past experience and focuses on one's competencies. An individual's confidence in his/her competencies directs the individual into situations which will require the use of those competencies. Task-specific self esteem is the result of feedback which comes directly from observation of the results of one's efforts. Lastly, socially-influenced self esteem results from communication or feedback from reference group members or society as a whole, concerning the value of an identity and the individual's ability to meet the expectations of the reference group and/or society as a whole.

SUMMARY 

The complete model of the self concept including the four components described above is illustrated in Figure 1. The following summarizes the structure and development of the self concept as proposed in our model:

  The self concept is a relatively stable, but changeable, set of self perceptions that are developed through social interaction, and includes self perceptions, ideal selves, social identities, and self esteem.
  The perceived self is comprised of a set of self cognitions regarding one's traits, competencies and values. It is developed and reinforced through social and task feedback, which results in two dimensions: level of perceptions and strength of perception. Level of perceptions refer to the degree to which an individual possesses an attribute relative to their ideal self and is expressed on a continuum from low to high. Strength of perception refers to how strongly the individual holds the perception of attribute level and is expressed on a continuum from weak to strong. The frame of reference or standard used to compare perceived and ideal self is either fixed or ordinal. The type of feedback which an individual receives from their primary group (i.e. conditional /unconditional) determines whether they use an inner- or other-directed standard to measure the ideal self.
  Social identities are those aspects of the self concept that derive from social categories to which he/she perceives him/herself as be-longing. Reference groups establish the role expectations and norms which guide the individual's behavior within the social identities. Two types of social identities are established: global identity and role-specific identities. The global identity is formed early in life and is the identity one wishes to display across all situations, roles and reference groups. The global identity forms the basis for role-specific identities. Role-specific identities are those identities established for a specific reference group or social role. Global and role-specific identities are inter-active.
  Self-esteem is the evaluative component of the self concept, and is a function of the distance between the ideal self and the perceived self. Three types of self-esteem are proposed: chronic, task-based and socially influenced.
Figure 1
Self Concept-Based Model of Motivation

The next section explains how the self concept provides the basis for a broader yet more parsimonious explanation of motivated behavior in organizations.
 

HOW THE SELF CONCEPT INFLUENCES BEHAVIOR IN ORGANIZATIONS 

The structure of the self concept may be thought of as a relatively stable set of cognitions that provide the basis for the expectancies, instrumentalities, and valences in instrumental or calculative motivation. However, there is also an expressive component of the self concept, which refers to how an individual processes information (feedback, observations, etc.) and uses the structure of the self concept to filter incoming information and translate this information into action. Much of the work in motivation relies heavily on cognitive models of behavior, and while many behaviors are the result of thought processes that are open to the individual's conscious inspection, other behaviors are the result of a process that is not entirely understood or conscious to the individual. We will refer to these acognitive processes, as the expressive component of the self concept. Both the expressive or acognitive processes, as well as the cognitive processes, are important in understanding the link between the self concept and behavior.

It is proposed that self perceptions of one's traits, competencies and values exist as knowledge structures which serve to monitor and control current experience, thought and actions. Some knowledge structures are cognitive in nature and provide data for information processing in a given social situation. These knowledge structures lead to behavioral patterns that appear stable across situations. Other knowledge structures, under certain conditions, may be inaccessible to retrieval and conscious introspection. Kihlstrom et al. (1988) call these aspects of the self, preconscious or subconscious. These acognitive knowledge structures account for individual behavior which seems to counter individual goals, or behavior which deviates from the individual's intentions and causes the individual to behave in ways that appear variable across situations. Expressive motivation is best explained by these acognitive knowledge structures.

Nisbitt and Wilson (1977) argue that people have access to (know) the products of cognitive processes but cannot access the actual workings of those processes. When applied to the self, this would suggest that people utilize the knowledge structures which are cognitive in nature to determine motivation at a calculative level, while motivation which results from acognitive knowledge structures must be inferred indirectly on the basis of behavior. Both cognitive knowledge structures and acognitive structures are often termed schema, or schemata, and provide a framework that helps the individual organize his or her world and provide meaning and structure to incoming information (Graesser, Woll, Kowalski & Smith, 1980). Schlenker (1985) refers to these self-schemata as "identities" and defines an identity as a theory or schema of an individual that describes, interrelates, and explains his or her relevant features, characteristics, and experiences. Thus, an individual's identity specifies the contents of what he/she is like, and secondly, it guides and regulates his/her subsequent experience by affecting thoughts, feelings, behaviors, and outcomes.

The major purpose of developing a model of the self concept is to provide a unitary construct that is able to explain both cognitive and acognitive motivational processes. Before linking self concept-based ideas to such motivational processes, we must first discuss what we call the sources of motivation: instrumental, intrinsic process, goal internalization, and internal and external self concept-based motivation.

SOURCES OF MOTIVATION 

As indicated earlier, most motivation theorists have proposed that there are two major sources of motivation: extrinsic and intrinsic (deCharms, 1968). Extrinsic motivation is that which derives from external forces and is represented in our model as instrumental sources of motivation. Our conceptualization of intrinsic motivation expands deCharms' definition of intrinsic motivation as behaviors which occur in the absence of external controls. This expansion integrates Deci's (1975) classification of intrinsic motivation as behaviors that individuals engage in to seek out challenging situations or to overcome challenges, Katz and Kahn's (1978) definition of internalized motivation as self-expression or internalized values and Etzioni's (1975) conceptualization of pure moral involvement which results from internalized values, and social moral involvement which is results from feedback from reference group members. These types of motivation are represented in our model as intrinsic process, goal internalization, and both internal and external self concept-based processes. In this section, we will discuss each of the sources of motivation in more detail.

Instrumental Motivation: Instrumental rewards are a motivating source when individuals believe that the behaviors they engage in will lead to certain outcomes such as pay, praise, etc. Rooted in the work of Barnard (1938) and March and Simon (1958), the basic assumption is that individuals and organizations constitute an exchange relationship. This is similar to Katz and Kahn's (1978) legal compliance and external rewards as bases of motivation and Etzioni's (1975) alienative and calculative involvement. Expectancy and equity theories are currently accepted models of motivation based on exchange relationships.

Intrinsic Process Motivation: Indi-viduals are motivated by intrinsic process rewards when they perform a behavior just because it is "fun". In other words, the motivation comes from the work itself. Individuals enjoy the work and feel rewarded simply by performing the task. There are no external controls regulating the behavior (deCharmes, 1968) and behavior that is challenging (Deci, 1975) may be considered enjoyable to some people. Hackman and Oldham's (1976) job characteristics model is representative of intrinsic process motivation.

Goal Internalization: Behavior is motivated by goal internalization when the individual adopts attitudes and behaviors because their content is congruent with their value system (Kelman, 1958). Katz and Kahn (1978) term this type of motivation, internalized values, and a similar concept is suggested by Etzioni's (1975) pure moral involvement. Some researchers have examined goal internalization as one dimension of organizational commitment (Becker, 1992; O'Reilly & Chatman, 1986).

Internal Self Concept-based Moti-vation: Self concept motivation will be inter-nally based when the individual is primarily inner-directed. Internal self concept motivation takes the form of the individual setting internal stand-ards that become the basis for the ideal self. The individual tends to use fixed rather than ordinal standards of self measurement as he/she at-tempts to first, reinforce perceptions of compe-tency, and later achieve higher levels of compe-tency. This need for achieving higher levels of competency is similar to what McClelland (1961) refers to as a high need for achievement. The motivating force for indi-viduals who are inner-driven and motivated by their self concept is task feedback. It is important to these individual that their efforts are vital in achieving outcomes and that their ideas and actions are instrumental in performing a job well. It is not important that others provide reinforcing feedback as is true for other-directed individuals. This process is akin to Deci's (1975) idea of intrinsic motivation as representing one's attempt to seek out and overcome challenges, and Katz and Kahn's (1978) idea of internalized motivation as self-expression derived from role performance.

External Self Concept-based Motivation: Self concept motivation is externally based when the individual is primarily other-directed. In this case, the ideal self is derived by adopting the role expectations of reference groups. The individual attempts to meet the expectations of others by behaving in ways that will elicit social feedback consistent with self perceptions. When positive task feedback is obtained, the individual finds it necessary to communicate these results to members of the reference group. The individual behaves in ways which satisfy reference group members, first to gain acceptance, and after achieving that, to gain status. These two needs, for acceptance and status, are similar to McClelland's (1961) need for affiliation and need for power. The individual continually strives to earn the acceptance and status of reference group members. This status orientation usually leads to an ordinal standard of self evaluation. This type of motivation is also similar to Etzioni's (1975) social moral involvement.

Individuals experience both internally- and externally-based self concept motivation to varying degrees. Whether or not an individual will be motivated by his or her self concept and whether the source of that motivation is internal or external, are dependent on a number of things. As discussed above, an individual may have a high or low self concept, strong or weakly held self perceptions and utilize a fixed or ordinal standard of evaluation. These characteristics lead to individual self concept types and patterns of behavior. In order to demonstrate how the proposed model of self concept-based motivation can increase our understanding of organizational behavior, we will discuss two of these types as examples.

  1. High and weakly held self concept, outer directed, using an ordinal standard. These individuals are highly competitive and self presentation is important. They have a need to put finger prints on success and to disassociate with failure. A prime concern for these individuals is establishing blame when failure occurs or establishing credits for group successes. These individuals are status and power oriented with a strong need for external or social affirmation.
  2. High and weakly held self concept, inner directed, using a fixed standard. These individuals set high standards for themselves. Each project is a test of their competency. These individuals seek task feedback and involve themselves in projects that test competencies and allow for this type of feedback. They must have ownership (control) over project outcomes. While they have a high self concept, this is not strongly held and thus they need to continually seek feedback through task performance.
While intrinsic, instrumental and goal internalization have been discussed extensively in previous literature, the focus of this paper is on self concept-based sources of motivation. If internal and external self concepts are valid bases of motivation distinct from the other sources, then they must be able to independently explain motivated behavior. In the following section, we will demonstrate how the self concept can enrich our understanding of traditional models of motivation. We will also discuss how the self concept directs behavior via adaptive strategies.
 
THE IMPACT OF SELF CONCEPT ON MOTIVATIONAL PROCESSES 

The motivational processes of expectancy, attribution, cognitive dissonance, and reinforcement have all been used to explain motivation. The following section will describe how each of these motivational processes can be understood by using the self concept as a basis of motivation.

Expectancy. The concept of expectancy is the cornerstone of the cognitive school of motivation. Expectancy theory posits that individuals choose among a set of behavioral alternatives on the basis of the motivational force of each alternative. The motivational force is a multiplicative combination of expectancy (i.e., the perceived probability that effort will lead to a desired outcome), instrumentality (i.e., the probability that this outcome will lead to a desired reward), and valence (i.e., value of the reward).

In the self-concept framework, individuals cognitively assess the likelihood of given actions leading to levels and types of task and/or social feedback consistent with their self perceptions. The valence of this feedback is based on the value or values associated with the role-specific identity as determined by the reference group. In other words, individual behavior is a choice process that is engaged in to obtain feedback on traits, competencies or values which are important in relation to the ideal self.

Attribution. The attribution process is concerned with the way in which individuals attempt to determine the causes of behavior. External attributions are those that are made when the observer (self or other) of a behavioral pattern believes that the actor is responding to situational forces, such as the expectation of a bonus. Internal attributions are made when the observer believes that the behavior is the result of some disposition of the actor such as a personality trait or internal value. Since the self concept is comprised of self perceptions of traits, competencies, and values, how the individual and others assess these attributes is important in the maintenance of these self perceptions.

In this process, the individual attempts to have others attribute certain traits, competencies and value to him/herself. The traits, competencies and values which the individual wishes to have attributed to him/her are those traits, competencies and values which are valued by the reference group to which the individual aspires. In order to achieve internal attribution, individuals must behave consistently across situations and across time. For example, with respect to competencies, individuals must establish control over task/project outcomes in order to generate the type of task/social feedback which is consistent with their self perceptions. In order for success to be attributed to the competencies of oneself, the other-directed individual seeks this control so that others attribute the outcomes of the task/project to him/herself. On the other hand, inner-directed individuals seek control of the task/project outcomes for their own satisfaction.

Cognitive Dissonance. According to the theory of cognitive dissonance (Festinger, 1957), inconsistency between two cognitive elements, whether they represent beliefs, attitudes, or behavior, gives rise to dissonance. Assumed to be unpleasant, the presence of dissonance is said to motivate the individual to change one or more cognitive elements in an attempt to eliminate the unpleasant state. With respect to the self concept, dissonance occurs when task or social feedback differs from self perception. When dissonance occurs, individuals attempt to resolve it by utilizing one or more of the following adaptive strategies.

Adaptive Strategies. Adaptive strategies are the primary mechanisms which individuals use to deal with dissonance (i.e., conflict between their self perceptions and social or task feedback). The strategies may be cognitive, or they may take the form of acognitive scripts (i.e., patterns for behavior) which people call upon regularly when faced with disconfirming feedback. These adaptive behaviors include:
  Motivation -Expending greater effort to improve the feedback in the future.
  Discounting Feedback - Seeking out confirming feedback to discount the disconfirming feedback, or discrediting the source of the disconfirming feedback.
  Changing Feedback - Presenting evidence, and/or arguing, that the individual's evaluation was incorrect. (I am not, you are too; am not, are too.)
  Disassociation - Disassociating oneself from the outcome of a project. Publicly showing that one was not really trying so that the link between task outcome and traits, competencies and values is not likely to be made.
  Association - Attempting to create a strong perceptual link between task outcome and traits, competencies and values. Linking oneself to successful or high status organizations or groups.
  Reaction Formation - Convincing the world, and oneself, that a particular trait, competency or value is of no importance.
  Feedback Avoidance - Avoiding the opportunity to receive feedback or to subject one's traits, competencies or values to confirmation.
  Reducing Status of Others - Attempting to show that others have lower traits, competencies or values than oneself.
  Reinforcement. Reinforcement theory explains behavior in terms of the reinforcing consequences of the behavior. Individuals learn to repeat certain behaviors because they are rewarded and they discontinue behaviors that are either punished or not rewarded (Thorndike, 1911). Reinforcers are the stimuli that are presented to the individual upon engaging in a behavior and serve to increase the probability of that behavior in the future.
Task and social feedback which confirm self perceptions act as basic reinforcers. The strength of the self perception is a function of the relative amount of prior reinforcement. Perceptions that are consistently reinforced become strong and lead to a strong self concept. When feedback is lacking or inconsistent, the result is a relatively weak self concept. In other words, whether the self concept is perceived to be either high or low on any trait, competency or value, it is the consistency of the feedback which determines the strength of these perceptions. The weaker the self concept, the greater the need for either task or social feedback, and thus the stronger the self concept-based motivation.

Now that we have shown how motivation can be explained by utilizing the construct of the self concept, we need to discuss how organizational systems designed to induce motivation are related to such a construct. Thus, the next section will discuss managerial implications of a self concept-based theory of motivation.
 

MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS: SELF CONCEPT AND INDUCEMENT SYSTEMS 

Inducement systems are those design aspects of an organization which act to energize, direct, or sustain behavior within the organization. The most commonly studied inducements systems are the reward, task, managerial, and social inducement systems. The reward system involves the design and implementation of formal reward systems in the organization, such as the compensation system and the promotional system. The task inducement system is involved with the motivational aspects of job and task design. The managerial inducement system derives its motivational properties from aspects of leadership style. Finally, the motivational impact of the work group or the organization as a social system defines the social inducement system.

The Reward Inducement System. The impact of reward systems on motivation has been analyzed mainly from a cognitive /instrumental perspective (Lawler, 1971). The motivational properties of pay systems have thus been tied to the expectation that increased effort will lead to greater pay and the instrumental value of pay to the individual. Thus, instrumental motivation is the primary source of motivation that the reward system attempts to induce. From a self concept perspective, pay provides a very potent form of social feedback. It tends to reinforce one's perception of competencies and provides an important source of status. Therefore, maintenance of the external self concept is an alternative source of motivation induced by the reward system. For example, a pay raise may be a form of pure instrumental motivation, or it may provide the basis upon which the individual's self perceptions are reinforced or enhanced.

Task Inducement System. The task design literature points to autonomy, task significance, feedback, task identity, and skill variety as attributes of the task that impact motivation (Hackman & Oldham, 1976). These authors claim that work redesign provides a strategy for enhancing internal work motivation (i.e., the individual does the work because it interests or challenges him/her). In terms of the self concept, the degree of autonomy would affect an individual's opportunity to attribute outcomes to his/her traits, competencies and values. The significance of a task, and one's contribution to the success of the task, would determine how important the feedback (task for inner-directed and social for other-directed) is to traits, competencies and values that comprise a role-specific identity that may be crucial to an individual's self concept. Task feedback is a necessary ingredient in reinforcement or affirmation of self perception, and one's ability to identify with a task would affect how important that feedback is to an individual's self concept. Skill variety would provide information regarding a number of traits, competencies and values that comprise different role specific identities. Goal internalization is the motivating source when the successful completion of a task helps fulfill important organizational goals that the individual has internalized into his/her own value system. Therefore, the task system induces motivation from all four of these sources (i.e., intrinsic process, internal and external self concept, and goal internalization) in significant ways.

The Managerial Inducement System. This inducement system also energizes, directs, and sustains behavior through a number of sources. Transactional leadership style is based on exchange relationships and is best utilized with individuals who are primarily instrumentally motivated. Socio-emotional leadership style provides an important source of social feedback, and is especially effective with other-directed individuals. Task leadership style provides inner-directed individuals with important task feedback regarding traits, competencies, and values. Leadership style, in terms of conditional /unconditional feedback, impacts one's self perception as well as one's self esteem. It is affected by the employee's ability to attribute task results to him/herself, depending on whether the leader is autocratic or participative. Lastly, transformational leadership style motivates by appealing to values and interests of the organization that have been internalized by the employees.

Social Inducement System. Under this inducement system, instrumentally-motivated individuals respond to norms and sanctions enforced by the work group or organization. These norms and sanctions provide both rewards and punishments that direct and sustain behavior. With regard to the self concept, individuals are motivated to demonstrate the traits, competencies, and values which are important to the work group. Thus, the social system provides the social feedback regarding one's level of these attributes.

Figure 2 presents a matrix of the five sources of motivation and the four inducement systems, illustrating how these sources are linked to each system as described above.

 

CONCLUDING REMARKS 

In this paper we have proposed a model of organizational behavior which is based on the self concept. Expanding current theories of motivation to include the self concept, in terms of self perception, an ideal self, self­esteem, and social identities, allows us to account for both situationally inconsistent behavior as well as the overall stability or cross­situational consistency of behavior. While this model is in some ways considerably more complex than existing models, it integrates an extremely large and diverse research literature in a unique way. Rather than arguing that self concept motivation replaces the calculative exchange paradigm, this model accounts for and expands our notion of motivated behavior. Most importantly, the self concept model provides a basis for explaining a wide array of phenomena typically grouped under the title of expressive or intrinsic moti-vation. It is our hope that it will provide a more realistic portrayal of motivation and a basis for future research.

REFERENCES 

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice­Hall.

Arvey, R.D., Bouchard, T.J., Jr., Segal, N.L. & Abraham, L.M. (1989). Job satisfaction: Environmental and genetic components. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 187-192.

Ashford, B.E. & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.

Atkinson, J.W. & Birch, D. (1970). The dynamics of action. New York: Wiley.

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Beach, L.R. & Mitchell, T.R. (1990). Image theory: A behavioral theory of decision making in organizations. In B. Staw & L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior. JAI Press, Inc.

Becker, T.E. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making? Academy of Management Journal, 35, 232-244..

Brief, A.P. & Aldag, R.J. (1981). The self in organizations: A conceptual review. Academy of Management Review, 6, 75-88.

Bowers, K. S. (1973). Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique. Psychological Review, 80, 307­336.

Cantor, N. & Kihlstrom, J.F. (1985). Social intelligence: The cognitive basis of personality. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 15-33.

Cantor, N. & Kihlstrom, J.F. (1987). Personality and social intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Cattell, R.B. (1965). The scientific analysis of personality. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.

deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.

Deci, E.L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.

Etzioni, A. (1975). Comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.

Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. New York: Free Press.

Festinger, L. (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Foote, N.N. (1951). Identification as the basis for a theory of motivation. American Sociological Review, 16, 14-21.

Gecas, V. (1982). The self concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 1-33.

Gecas, V. (1986). The motivational significance of self-concept for socialization theory. In E.J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in Group Processes: 131-156.

Gerhardt, B. (1987). How important are dispositional factors as determinants of job satisfaction -- Implications for job design and other personnel programs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 366-373.

Gottfredson, L.S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 545-579.

Graesser, A.C., Woll, S.B., Kowalski, D.J. & Smith, D.A. (1980). Memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 6, 503­515.

Greenwald, A.G. & Pratkanis, A.R. (1984) The self. In R.S. Wyer & T.S. Srull (Eds), Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NH: Earlbaum.

Hackman, J.R. & Oldham, G.R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.

Harvey, O.J., Kelley, H.H., Shapiro, M.M. (1957). Reactions to unfavorable evaluations of the self made by other persons. Journal of Personality, 25, 393-411.

Higgins, E.T., Klein, R.L., & Strauman, T.J. (1987). Self discrepancies: Distinguishing among self-states, self-state conflicts, and emotional vulnerabilities. In K. Yardley & T. Hones (Eds.), Self and identity: Psychosocial contributions: 173-186. New York: Wiley.

James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.

Jones, E.E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W.H. Freeman.

Jones, E. E., & Nisbitt, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer, divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation and individual differences in learning: An integration of developmental, differential, and cognitive perspectives. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 219-237.

Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. (1978) The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.

Kelly, H.H. (1971). Attribution in social interaction. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

Kelman, H. (1958). The induction of action and attitude change. In G. Nielson (Ed.), Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Applied Psychology: 81-110.

Kihlstrom, J.F. and Cantor, N. (1984). Mental representations of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17: 1­47.

Kihlstrom, J.F., Albright, J.S., Klein, S.B., Cantor, N., Chew, B.R., & Niedenthal, P.M. (1988). Information processing and the study of the self. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 21: 145­180.

Korman, A.K. (1970). Toward a hypothesis of work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 31-41.

Lawler, E.E. (1971). Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Locke, E.A. & Henne, D. (1986). Work motivation theories. In C.L. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: 1-35. Chichester, England: Wiley.

March, J. & Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.

Markus, H. & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.

McClelland, D.C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.

Mitchell, T.R. & James, L.R. (1989). Conclusions and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 14, 401­407.

Nisbitt, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231­259.

O'Reilly, C., III, & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization of prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492-499.

Pervin, L. A. (1975). Personality: Theory, assessment & research. New York: Wiley.

Pervin, L. A. (1989) Persons, situations, inter-actions: The history of a controversy and a discussion of theoretical models. Academy of Management Review, 14, 3, 350­360.

Reisman, David (1961). The lonely crowd. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.

Roberts, B.W. & Donahue, E.M. (1994). One personality, multiple selves: Integrating personality and social roles. Journal of Personality, 62:2, 199-218.

Rogers, C.R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science: 184-256. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Rynes, S., & Lawler, J. (1983). A policy-capturing investigation of the role of expectancies in decisions to pursue job alternatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 620-631.

Schlenker, B.R. (1980). Impression manage-ment: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Schlenker, B.R. (1984). Identities, identification, and relationships. In V. Derlega (Ed.), Communication, intimacy, and close relationships. New York: Academic Press.

Schlenker, B. R. ( 1985) Identity and self­identification, In The self and social life. B.R. Schlenker (ed.), 15­99. New York: McGraw Hill.

Schwartz, S.H. & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878-891.

Shamir, Boas (1990). Calculations, values and identities: The sources of collective work motivation. Human Relations, 43, 313-332.

Shamir, B. (1991). Meaning, self and motivation in organizations. Organizational Studies, 12:3, 405-424.

Snyder, R.A. & Williams, R.R. (1982). Self theory: An integrative theory of work motivation. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55, 257-267.

Staw, B. & Ross, J. (1985) Stability in the midst of change: A dispositional approach to job attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 469­480.

Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.

Stryker, S. (1986). Identity theory: Developments and extensions. In K. Yardley & T. Honess (Eds.), Self and Identity. New York: Wiley.

Stryker, S. & Serpe R. (1982). Commitment, identity salience, and role behavior: Theory and research example. In W. Ickes & E. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles and social behavior: 119-218. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Sullivan, J.J. (1989). Self theories and employee motivation. Journal of Management, 15, 2, 345-363.

Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations: 7-24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Thorndike, E.L. (1911). Individuality. Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin.

Tolman, E.C. (1943). Identification and the post-war world. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 141-148.

 

<< Back to PE 707 Home

© 2001
For more information, contact Kathy Ermler at 620-341-5945.

 
+ نوشته شده در  سه شنبه دوم خرداد 1385ساعت 17:32  توسط علی  | 

PSYCHOLOGY    PORTAL

Personality

Self-concept

Main Index > Psychology 20 Index > Themes > Personality Index > Self-concept

Introduction

In this lesson we shall explore the relationship of personality to self-concept.  

Objectives:

After completing the activities for this topic you should be able to answer the following questions:

  1.  What is a self-concept?

  2. How does the self-concept develop?

  3. What influences the development of a self-concept?

  4. How important is your self-concept?

  5.  What do we do when our self-concept is threatened?

Activities:  

Activity A: What is self-concept?

A.      Design and conduct a survey in which people in certain age ranges (12-18, 19-35, 36-50, 50-) are asked the question, what is self-concept?

B.     Analyze the results. Based on the results, what are the top 10 influences? Are there gender differences in the results (in other words, do males describe self-concept differently than females, and do females describe self-concept differently males? Are there age differences (in other words, do the descriptions of self-concept change according to the age of the respondent)?

C.     Construct your own definition of self-concept. What does self-concept mean to you? How does understanding what your self-concept means help you in terms of relationships?

D.     Compare your definition of self-concept with that of social psychologists. In what ways are they the same or different? Based on what research says, would you modify your definition? Why or why not?

Activity B: Who are you?  

If some one asked you to describe yourself, what would you say? How do you think other people would describe you? What are your strengths? What do you do well? What are your talents and skills?  Some categories or traits that you might consider as the basis for your reflection include:

  • Extroversion (outgoing)

  • Introversion (shy, reserved)

  • Aggression and anger

  • Competitiveness

  • Kindness

  • Empathy

  • Emotionalism

  • Perseverance

  • Values

  • Motivations

  • Volunteerism

  • Honesty

  • Athleticism

  • Artistic 

  • Leader or follower

  • Individualistic-oriented or collectivist in nature

Be prepared to describe yourself. You might want to draw a picture, write a poem, compose a piece of music, create a collage or create a piece of sculpture.

 Activity C: Feel like a number

Listen to the song, "Feel like a number" from the album Stranger in Town (1976), recorded by Bob Seger. For the lyrics, click here. Using the lyrics from the song, be prepared to discuss instances in which people have de-personalized others in your classroom, school and community.  Have you ever felt depersonalized?  Be prepared to describe the situations.  

Activity D: From both perspectives

Using the online resources provided as a starting point, what evidence can you find to support both a nature (genetic inheritance) as well as a nurture (sociocultural environment) explanation for self-concept? Create a two column chart and list your arguments for each in the appropriate column. An example is provided below:

Nature           |             Nurture
                      |
                      |
                      |
                      |

Activity E: Theoretical perspectives on self-concept

  1. Select one of the six major theoretical perspectives, and review the overview information:

  2. Based on that theoretical perspective, be prepared to explain the development and maintenance of a self-concept from that theoretical perspective. In other words, if you were an Ethological (biological) psychologist, what examples could you provide to support your belief that self-concept is rooted in our biology, a genetically inherited characteristic. If you were an Ecological psychologist, what examples could you find in people's behaviour to support your belief that self-concept is a factor of social and cultural influences such as parenting, lifestyle, stress and social norms.

  3. Be prepared to present your research findings in class in a discussion about which theoretical perspective best describes and explains the development and maintenance of a self-concept.

Activity F: Societal influences on self-concept

  1. Using the Ecological Model proposed by Urie Bronfenbrenner, list as many specific examples as you can for how each of the three systems of support (microsystem, exosystem and macrosystem) influence the personalities of males and females.

  2. Based on that list, be prepared to answer the following questions:

  • Is any one system of support more influential than the others on the personalities of males as compared to females?

  • Within that system (e.g., exosystem), is there one aspect of that system that is more influential than the others on males and females?

  • Do different systems have more influence on females than males?

  • Of all the various influences listed in the Ecological Model, is there one, primary influence? Is this one, primary influence the same for both males and females? 

Activity G: Significant others

Who are the significant others in your life?  In what ways have they influenced your life?  Are you a significant other for someone else?  What qualities do you possess such that you could be a significant other?

Activity H: Defense mechanisms

Based on the 10 types of defense mechanisms described in the online document, create a role play of various defense mechanisms. What defense mechanisms do you use? Are there different mechanisms for different situations?

Activity I: Importance of self-concept

How important is a positive self-esteem? What influence does a high or low self-esteem have on our social relationships? Read the online document, The importance of self-esteem. According to those criteria, do you consider yourself to have a high self-esteem. Consider your friends and peers. Do these criteria apply to them? What might be the relationship of low self-esteem to antisocial behaviours such as bullying, aggressive behaviour and gang behaviours? What do positive self-esteem people do, what behaviours do they demonstrate that leads you to conclude that they have a positive or high self-esteem? What can you do to raise your, or a friend's self-esteem?

Resources

Making connections

  • Attraction
  • Intimacy
  • Androgyny
  • Body image
  • Influence of the media
  • Cultural industries: music, fashion and beauty

Critical Thinking: Self-esteem comes from doing esteemable acts. (Anonymous)

+ نوشته شده در  سه شنبه دوم خرداد 1385ساعت 17:28  توسط علی  | 

 
 Search: The Web Tripod      X-Men 3
share this page Share This Page  report abuse Report Abuse  build a page Build a Site  show site directory Browse Sites  hosted by tripod
    Online Degrees « Previous | Top 100 | Next » hosted by tripod
Click Here!

Other research

Experiences Leading to Self Actualization: Personal Growth and Life Satisfaction in a College Student Population.


           

 

 

Running head: Experiences leading

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Experiences Leading to Self Actualization: Personal Growth and Life Satisfaction in a College Student Population.

Benjamin Hidalgo

Pomona College

Abstract

Positive psychological functioning can be conceptualized in many different ways. The present study examined positive psychological functioning as indicated by self-actualization in a sample of 104 college students. Using a paper and pencil questionnaire, five areas of experience and activities were examined as predictors of a student's extent of self actualization. These areas were, a student's spiritual experiences, his or her experiences with non-prescription psychoactive substances, interpersonal relationship experiences, experiences in nature, and academic experiences. Positive correlations were found with both a person's spiritual experiences and level of close relationships, with level of self actualization. A negative correlation was discovered between a person's use of legal drugs (alcohol, caffeine/ephedrine, and tobacco) and his or her level of self actualization. Recommendations for future studies are proposed and implications of the results for the Claremont Colleges are discussed.

 


 

Experiences leading to Self actualization: A study of personal growth and life satisfaction in a college student population.

            The are many ways in which to conceptualize positive mental health. (Jahoda, 1958; Gilliand, James, & Bowman, 1989.) The choice of a definition of what it is to have positive mental health has a direct bearing on the outcome of any study in which positive psychological functioning is compared to other domains of life. An example can be seen in the treatment of religious experiences by certain models of psychological health. For the psychoanalytic researcher this domain often has a negative impact on a persons psychological health (Prince & Savage, 1972), while for the transpersonal researcher it may have a positive effect (Maslow, 1964).


Self actualization

Take me to the top

            The concept of positive psychological functioning that generally guides the present study is that of self actualization. Defined for purposes of this study, it is that state that a person reaches in which he or she is experiencing life in a way that allows for optimal growth towards a better state of being. The general concept used in the present study is most akin to the two most popular concepts of self actualization presented by the humanistic psychologists Abraham Maslow (1968) and Carl Rogers (1961, 1980). Maslow viewed the self actualized person in two ways. This person will have realized latent potentials, talents and abilities as well as achieved a state of self-fulfillment. "Such people seem to be fulfilling themselves and to be doing the best that they are capable of doing. They are people who have developed or are developing to the full stature of which they are capable" ( Maslow, 1970, p. 150). Maslow based his concept of the self actualized person on an analysis of personal acquaintances and friends as well as on the lives of public and historical figures. Self actualizing people, he reports have the following personality and behavior characteristics: More accepting of themselves, others, natural processes; more spontaneous and natural; enjoying solitude more than the average person; more independent of their physical and cultural environment; more appreciative of the basic goods in life; more likely to experience the acute mystic or peak experience; more likely to possess a special kind of creativeness and originality; and a more philosophical, unhostile sense of humor.

            Rogers (1961) had a similar view to Maslow's of  positive psychological functioning. The Rogerian view is based on his interactions with people in psychotherapy and their positive functioning. Carl Rogers shied away from the term "self actualization", which implies that a person has reached a fulfilled end state, and substituted for it the concept of the fully functioning person. Roger's "fully functioning person" is not one who has reached a perfect end-state, rather one who had the freedom to fully experience and access those conditions that nurture growth. For Carl Rogers this state was the process of fully being and continuous becoming for an organism when it is inwardly free to move in any direction. Rogers characterized a person who had successfully tapped into this type of process as being: increasingly open to experience, increasingly existential in his or her living, and increasingly trusting in his or her organism. For Rogers, then, the self actualized person is one who is in his or her everyday life fully open to experience in a way that allows them learn and grow.


Operationalizing Self actualization

Take me to the top

            These two psychologists use extensive personal interviews and interactions to assess the self-actualized person, however, due to the subjective nature of each of these psychologist's views on positive psychological functioning, operationalizing their concepts of self actualization has proved somewhat difficult. Various people have developed operational definitions of certain aspects of self actualization.  A very comprehensive view of positive psychological functioning was developed by Carol Ryff (1989) to assess the concepts present in Rogers' and Maslow's theories as well as those present in life span developmental theories such as Erikson's (1959), and Buhler's (1935). After carefully reviewing a literature base of mostly humanistic theories on the subject, Ryff identified six characteristics of positive and superior psychological functioning. Ryff developed the following theory-guided dimensions of well-being and self actualization: Self acceptance, positive relations with others, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth.

            Along with her new theory-driven instrument, Ryff (1989) included indicators of positive psychological functioning that were less theory-driven. These measure of subjective well-being typically define "high psychological functioning" as high life satisfaction, high positive affect and low negative affect.  Ryff's operationalized view of positive psychological functioning is comprised of high subjective well-being as well as high scores on her six theory-driven components. Her operationalization of positive psychological functioning is similar to the way in which the present study has operationalized positive psychological functioning which, subsequently, has been termed "self actualization."

            There is one major difference between the way the present study defines self actualization and the way in which it is conceptualized above. The present study sought to eliminate from the concept of self-actualization those components that are arbitrarily defined by the researcher.  Questions of subjective bias result when the researcher is free to assert that another person is or is not self-actualized based on indirect measures of a lifestyle which the researcher considers to be successful. Most of the aspects of self actualization characterized by the above psychologists are based on a single researcher's observation of people he or she considered to be the ideal person. These people were then studied and their positive behaviors and personality traits (as defined by the researcher) were established as the universal marker for the self actualized, positively functioning person. Any approach, however, that defines how well a person is living his or her life in a way that excludes that person from the decision is problematic. While some attempt has been made to measure self-actualization in a less biased way (Ryff, 1989) the concept is still approached from a pre-set determination of optimum personality structure in a way that, for the most part, excludes the experiencer from having the final say in how successful and actualized his or her life is.  Sufficient evidence was not found in the literature, by the present study's principal investigator, to support any of the personality trait combinations as being the most applicable to the self actualized person. Maslow (1971) readily admits that his construct of the fully self actualized occasionally fails to account for a person whom he, in retrospect, judges to self actualized.  This particular lack of universal applicability and the more general problem in psychology of pigeon-holing a person's subjective psychological world into a contrived and artificially objective structure prevents the present study from validating most of the components of self-actualization reviewed above.

            A new, more subjective (for the participant) approach to self-actualization was adopted for the present study. Personal growth and subjective well-being have been isolated from the above self-actualization theories because they are the ones that are defined less by the researcher and more by the person whose life is being assessed. These two very distinct components of a person's life intersect in a way that indicates a person's subjective sense of positive and optimal psychological functioning. It is the approach of this study that a person's self actualization or full and healthy functioning can only be defined by how well that person subjectively believes that he or she has grown into a place in which he or she is more satisfied with how he or she is living life.  Self actualization for the rest of this paper, then,  will be defined as a person's subjective sense of personal growth and his or her subjective sense of well-being and life satisfaction. 


Who can become self actualized?

Take me to the top

             "What  kind of person can become self actualized?" Most of the research done in the field of personal growth and subjective well-being focuses on the personality traits or demographic variables that define a person. These studies have found that a variety of these types of factors influence a person's ability to self actualize as defined by this study. Personal characteristics typically examined include ethnicity, age, gender, nationality, religiosity, religious group identity, socio-economic-status, and general culture. (Myers & Diener, 1995)

            However, fewer studies have comprehensively looked at activities and experiences leading to self actualization or even subjective well being. The present study is concerned with those experiences that a person can actively select that affect his or her ability to self actualize. This study is less concerned with what background a person has or what type of personality he or she has, and more concerned with what experiences the person has and actively seeks.  Experiences that are typically central to many college students' lives were noted along with experiences most commonly studied in the literature. Five areas of experience, whose correlations to self actualization or subjective-well being[1]  have been previously studied, were selected for inclusion in this study based on relevance to a Claremont College student's life. These were: spiritual experiences, drug experiences, experiences in close relationships, experiences in nature, and the academic experience. The hypotheses as to how a person's experiences in these areas would influence his or her tendency towards self actualization were generated from a short review of the literature concerning these experiences.

            Most research done in the area of spirituality and subjective well-being has found a positive correlation between the two. (Myers & Diener, 1995) The Gallup foundation (1984) found that people with high spiritual commitment (tending to agree more often with statements like "My religious faith is the most important influence in my life") were twice as likely to say that they were "very happy" compared to those with low spiritual commitment. A study by Donahue and Benson (1995) found that there was a robust positive association between religiousness, defined by God-centered spirituality, and adolescent well-being and pro-social values and behavior. It was furthermore negatively correlated with suicide ideation and attempts as well as delinquency.  Studies have also examined whether different types of spiritual experiences have an impact on a person's ability to self actualize.  John Larsen  (1979) using Maslow's theory of self actualization and Stark's (1965) definition of religious experience types (confirming, responsive, ecstatic, and revelational), found no differences between type of religious experience and self actualization.  While other studies have shown a difference in level of subjective well-being and personal growth (self-actualization) based on the type of religious experience a person has, (Greely, 1975; Poloma & Pendelton, 1989), there is a great general variability in the way in which theorists categorize religious and spiritual experiences. The present study will concern itself only with the incidence and centrality of a person's self defined spiritual experience. It is hypothesized that the more a student finds his or her spiritual experience to be a central part of his or her life, the higher they will score on the self-actualization measure.

            An overwhelming majority of the studies examining self actualization and drug use tend to demonstrate the negative relationships between a person's use of psychoactive substances and his or her ability to self actualize. Many of these studies focus on the move towards self actualization in drug abusers as they become sober. (Skolnick & Zuckerman, 1979; Jansen, Knapp, & Knapp, 1976)

            However, a few studies and theoreticians have painted certain recreational drugs taken in "appropriate" situations as being useful in a person's search for self actualization. (Walsh 1982, Rogers, 1980) Carl Rogers (1980) cautiously promoted the use of LSD for those people who choose to use it appropriately in a controlled way in order to be more fully in touch with their true selves. Being in touch with who one really is, according to Rogers, is the only way to become self actualized. Roger Walsh (1982) conducted studies on self actualized people who were psychedelic drug users and non-drug users. He found that when psychedelic drugs use was employed in combination with a more traditional discipline (such as meditation) self actualization was promoted.

            Also at issue is the legality of certain drugs. Those psychoactive substances that are legal are much more readily available to the general population and are socially accepted. The legal and social phenomenon of  accepted and non-accepted psychoactive substances is important to the present study because, one would assume, different types of people would be grouped into categories of people who use legal drugs and those who use illegal drugs. While a psychoactive substance experience is defined simply by the initiation of an altered state of consciousness many Americans and college students view legal and illegal drug consumption as two completely distinct experiences. For purposes of this study they have also been measured separately. Also at issue is the reason that a person chooses to use these substances. For example caffeine consumption because one enjoys the taste of the beverage is a different experience than consumption because one feels that he or she needs it to be productive.  The reasons that a person feel is most influential in his or her use of drugs was, therefore, also assessed in this study. It was predicted that the more a that a person's drug experiences play an important part in his or her life the less self actualized that person will tend to be. This however might be qualified, however, by the reason that a person chooses to use the substance. The person who uses a substance in an effort towards personal betterment might score significantly higher than the average student.

            A person's experience of close and intimate relations with other people has long been associated with self actualization (Myers and Diener, 1995; Pavot, Diener, & Fujiata, 1990) A few researchers have even gone so far as to include intimate and positive interpersonal relationships in their definitions of self actualization (Ryff, 1989; Rogers, 1961) This ability to form intimate and genuine relationships with the people with whom a given person interacts is essential in leading to self actualization according to these psychologists. "Self actualizers are described as having strong feelings of empathy and affection for all human beings and as being capable of greater love, deeper friendship, and more complete identification with others." (Ryff, 1989: 1071) It was predicted that the more central a close relationships were to a person's life the more self-actualized they would be.

            Only a few studies have examined a person's experience in nature and its ability to help them self actualize, A study done by Young and Crandel (1984) helps explain the influence of wilderness use and self actualization as defined by Maslow's criterion. This study found that wilderness users were more self actualized than non-users and that potential users were more self-actualized than potential non-users. It was hypothesized that the more that nature experiences played a part in a person's life the more self actualized he or she would tend to be.

            Finally when looking at academics it has been found, in studies examining demographic data and subjective well being, that higher education tends to lead towards higher subjective well being. Diener, Diener, and Diener (1995) found that, in a study with 120,000 participants throughout 55 countries, higher education was a significant predictor of subjective well-being.  This makes sense when one looks at other demographic variables associated with higher education (e.g. income and security). High attainment in these areas indicate that a person is most likely able to meet his or her basic needs. According to Maslow's theory of self actualization and hierarchy of needs (1968),  it is only when a person meets his or her basic needs that he or she can self actualize. While types of education and the reasons for obtaining it might help determine the extent to which academic experiences help a person to self actualizes, the present study is content to assess the extent to which a person's devotion to his or her understanding of the academic experience will help him or her to self actualize.


Hypothesis

Take me to the top

            In summary the present study focuses on five common areas of experience in a college student's life through which he or she can obtain higher levels of self actualization and human functioning. These areas are a person's spiritual experience;  his or her experience with psychoactive substance, both legal and illegal; his or her involvement in close relationships, his or her experiences in nature, and his or her academic experiences. The present study examines the centrality of these experiences to a person's life and how this might relate to his or her ability to self actualize. The study was designed to test the following more specific hypotheses.

Hypotheses:

1) The more central a student's spiritual experience is to his or her

     life, the more self actualized he or she will be.

2) The more central drug experiences are to a student's life, the less

     likely he or she will be to self-actualize. However, if the primary

     reason for drug use is explicitly one that is engaged in an effort to 

     promote self betterment (e.g. Using LSD for spiritual

     exploration,) the student will be more self actualized than those

     that use drugs for purely recreational reasons.

3) The more central a student's close relationships are to his or her

      life, the more self actualized he or she will be.

4) The more central a person's nature experiences are to his or her

      life, the more self actualized he or she will be.

5) The more central a person's academic experiences are to his or her

      life the more self actualized he or she will be.


Methods

Take me to the top

Participants

            One-hundred-and-four students at the Claremont Colleges participated in this study. Approximately 76% of the participant were women (n=79); 24% were men (n=25). The participants were, a convenience sample from dining halls, classrooms, computer labs, and in common rooms. People were also recruited from parties but did not fill out a questionnaire if they were not sober. Almost all people asked to participate returned a completed survey. Some of the participants who were suspected of frequent illicit drug use or  high frequency of religious experience were purposefully asked to fill out the questionnaire as it was believed that a completely random sample of the colleges would not yield significant sample sizes for the categories of spirituality and drug use.

Materials and Procedure

            Participants were given a 47 item questionnaire of three main sections: demographics, measures of experience, and measures of self actualization. [See appendix] The demographics included short- answer questions concerning age, gender, ethnicity, semesters in college, grade point average, and concentration.

            The second section, measuring experiences that college students seek out, was divided into five areas. Each area was measured differently but standardized to carry the same weight as a predictor of self actualization. The first area assessed the participant's religious, spiritual, or mystical experiences. Participants reported the frequency, personal significance and setting for these experiences. They were further asked if they had, in the last four years, had a spiritual, mystical, or religious experience that had significantly altered the way they lived their lives. This section was scored by assigning a z-score to three of the items (frequency, significance, and presence of a life altering experience), then averaging those for a total z-score for the section. Each participant's score on each of these items was turned into a percentage based on the highest possible score for that item (e.g. a score of five on a seven point likert scale was transformed into a percentage score of 71.43%.) These three percentages were averaged to yield a person's total score on the spirituality measure out of 100%. This mean percentage score of the centrality of a spirituality in a person's life can be seen in Table one. The exact item content can be seen in the Appendix.

            The next area of inquiry assessed the participant's patterns of non-prescription drug use. The first part of this subsection examined the participant's uses of the following legal drugs: caffeine or ephedrine (an over the counter stimulant commonly used by college students), tobacco, and alcohol. The participants were asked to rate how frequently they used each of these substances, the primary factors that they believe led to their use, and the significance that these substances played in their lives. The participants were asked to answer the same questions in the second part of this subsection regarding their illicit drug use. These drugs were categorized in the following way: Cocaine, exstasy, inhalants, LSD and psilocybin (mushrooms), marijuana, methamphetamine, nootropics (smart drugs), hallucinogens not mentioned above, amphetamines and stimulants not mentioned above, and downers and depressants not listed above. The category "other" was also made available twice for a participant to identify substances used that did not fall into the above categories, however, no one chose this category. Each part of this section was given a separate score using the same formula. A total score for amount of consumption was determined for the legal and as well as the illegal drugs by adding up the frequency scores (zero to 5, 0 = "never" and 5 = "several time a week") for each individual drug. Using this method each participant was given a consumption score out of a total of 15 for legal drugs and out of a total of 55 for illegal drugs. Each drug experience type (legal and illegal) was measured separately. For each drug type, a z-score was determined for consumption and for the participant's score on a seven point likert measure of the significance that each drug played in his or her life. These two scores for both types of drugs were averaged in order to determine, for each participant, an overall z-score for legal drug use and for illegal drug use. These two sub-sections were then scored in a similar way to the spirituality measure in that for each person, each component (consumption and drug significance) was assigned a percentage score based on the total possible score he or she could have received had the provided the highest answers. Again this was used simply to determine the mean score on this section and can be seen in Table one. The exact item content for this section can be found in the appendix.

            The third area assessed the participant's experience of close relationships. Participants were asked of they were in a close relationship. They were then asked to rate their level of closeness to the following people in their lives: significant other, friends, parents, faculty/teachers, and "other."  The rating for each item was from one to five, (5= "very close" and 1= "not close at all"). The participants were then asked to rate their level of satisfaction with their relationships with the people listed in the previous question. They were finally asked to rate how significant their relationships with the same people were to their overall lives. The latter two questions were also scored on a five-point likert scale.

            Each participant was given a score out of a total of five for each item they responded to.  Each person's total  score for this section was turned into a percentage of the total possible score had they responded with a "five" for each item filled out. For example, a person  who had no significant other and did not enter a person for the other category was scored out of a total possible of 45 points. These scores were then standardized into a z-score. The mean, non-standardized, percentage scores can be found in Table one. The exact item content can be found in the appendix.

            The fourth and fifth areas of experience that were hypothesized  to be associated with self actualization were experiences in nature and academic experiences. Nature experiences were defined for the participants as "those experiences in which your exposure to or interaction with a natural setting has a significant effect on your immediate state of being." This was assessed and scored in a similar way to other areas in that the participants were asked to report the frequency and significance of their nature experiences. This was scored by assigning a z-score for each item then averaging the z-score for an overall experience of nature score. The area of concerning academic experience was examined by assessing the importance of the participant's academic pursuits and success in their academic career (two separate items) along with the average number of hours the participant spent weekly on schoolwork (including class hours). As in other sections, a z-score was assigned for each item, then all three z-scores were averaged for an overall z-score on the participant's academic experience. For both of these measures the mean percentage score as assessed in the previous three measures are presented in Table one. The exact item content for these measures can be found in the appendix.

            The two aspects of self actualization assessed in this study were personal growth and life satisfaction. Personal growth was assessed using a single item seven-point likert measure of significant personal growth since entering college. Life satisfaction was assessed by Neugarten's Life Satisfaction Index-A, (LSIA) (Neugarten, Havinghurts, & Tobin, 1961) one of the most common multi-item measure of subjective well-being. This scale assesses life satisfaction by examining the following issues in a person's life: zest versus apathy, resolution and fortitude, congruence between desired and achieved goals, self concept, and positive vs. negative affect. The measure is scored from zero (low subjective well-being and life satisfaction) to twenty (high subjective well-being and life satisfaction). A total self actualization score for each participant was determined in this study by simply averaging the percentage scores of personal growth and the percentage score from the LSIA. See Table one for the mean scores on these sections and see the appendix for the item content of this measure of self-actualization.

            These data were analyzed using a one-way Spearman correlation matrix. Further analysis, forced entry linear multiple regression, was used in order to determine the degree to which each experience predicted self-actualization.


Results

Take me to the top

            Out of the five predictors of self actualization, three proved to correlate significantly with self actualization. Mean scores can be seen in Table one. The hypothesis that high scorers on spirituality would score highly on the self actualization measure was supported (r=.20, p<.05). The hypothesis that high drug use would correlate with low self actualization except when the user primarily used the substance for the purpose of self exploration and development was partially supported. While no significant correlation was found between a person's score on the illegal drug section and their level of self actualization it was found that a persons score on the legal drug section correlated negatively with their score on the self actualization section (r=-.24, p=.02). There were no significant differences, however, in scores on self actualization based on the reason a person chose to use drugs. Finally a person's score on the close relationship measure was found to correlate with his or her score on the self actualization measure (r=.27, p=.01).  These correlations between all of the predictor variables and self actualization can be seen in Table 2. Forced entry multiple regression was performed in order to determine the degree to which each main factor predicted self actualization. The results of this analysis can be seen in Table 3. This analysis revealed that only a person's score on the close relationships section was a significant predictor of his or her score on the self actualization measure. 


Discussion

Take me to the top

            The aim of the present study was to determine which experiences in a Claremont College student's life predict self actualization. This study provides support for the general body of studies that demonstrate significant links between a person's spirituality and how well they are living their lives. This data from the present study reveal that not only are college students in Claremont "spiritual" but that their spirituality might be helping them to live better lives. The finding that a student who has more successful close relationships tends to be more self actualized is also one that is already widely supported by prior studies. The fact that, when multiple regression was used, the experience of interpersonal relationships was the only statistically significant predictor of self actualization, might suggest that more energy should be spent by administration and professors to promote those conditions that nurture relationships. For example more seminars and special classes on mediation, or resolution conflict might be offered. Professors might want to make themselves more available and interact in personable ways with the student they teach.

            Also of interest was the finding that legal drug use was a negative predictor of self actualization. Perhaps, in light of studies such as this one, the colleges should re-examine their liberal alcohol policy or should, as an alternative, provide better support for rehabilitative centers and legal drug abuse campaigns. If a student were more aware of the detriments that these substances can have on a person's life they might be more selective and conservative in their consumption.

            Nature and academic experiences were not correlated with self actualization even though the this sample of students produced a full range of responses as to the centrality of these experiences to their lives. This would seem to indicate that, while these experiences might be very central to how a person lives his or her life, they do not aid necessarily in that person's attainment of self actualization.

             Carl Rogers  (1980) asserts that all experiences are valid and only a full appreciation of them can lead to self actualization and full functioning. The data from the present study, however, indicate that, for the college student, looking at his or her experience in some domains of life rather than others is more useful in determining how likely her or she is to self actualize.

            Future studies of college students might want to take other areas of experience into account as possibly influencing their self actualizing ability. Perhaps a person choosing into an experience in a multicultural setting is indicative of his or her ability to self actualize and should be examined. Jason Lehman (1993) decided to examine self actualization as a function expected or actual study abroad experiences for Claremont College students. He did not find a significant correlation between self actualization, as defined by Maslow, and the study abroad experience. However, he presents convincing arguments as to why a consideration of cross -cultural experiences should be included in studies on self-actualization in the Claremont Colleges. In the present study, experiences that Claremont college students often listed as being central to their lives, in addition to the areas assessed, were recreational and leisure activities such as dance and sports and non-academic work. Future studies might want to include these experiences in a person's life as being influential in their tendency to become self actualized.

            Future studies might also want to take into incorporate two design changes to this measure. One of the changes concerns how the concept of self-actualization can be assessed along a projected life path and the other concerns how the relative centrality of a nature experience is understood. The first critique of this study brought up  is a more fundamental philosophical one based on a process philosophy view of the self. It is an artificial distinction, according to the process philosopher to separate the self into past, present, and future.  Our past experiences make up an equally important part of who we are as our present experience of life does. Furthermore, our future oriented direction is just as pivotal in defining our state of self as our past and present states. Because we live a long a continuum it is shortsighted to examine the state of the self in only one or two of these dimensions. A full, three dimensional view of ourselves is the only fully accurate view that we can use. The third or future dimension of measuring whether or not a person is fully functioning and therefore self actualized was neglected in this study. However future studies examining this might include a question, of equal weight in the self actualization section, perhaps asking to what extent the participant feels that he or she has a purpose in life.

            The second critique of this study is more subtle design flaw. There is a confound when measuring how much a person's experience in nature influences their ability to self actualize since when running a correlational statistic on the measure in this study or Young and Crandall's (1984) does not take into account comparable environmental situations. There is no identifiable base of possible environments from which to assess the relative significance of nature in a person's life. Has a person's significance placed on nature been compared with that of the city and to that of the residential setting, for example, there would have been grounds on which to say that a person's experiences in a natural environment, as opposed to another, are correlated with self actualization.


Applicability

Take me to the top

            This study examines cases in which the Claremont College student subjectively experiences life in a way that is associated with his or her self actualization. This study might be seen as more useful from a clinical approach in that its results are not very useful for establishing universal goals or experiences that absolutely lead to self actualization. The present study is, instead, useful only in surveying the nature of the college student. Specifically the survey examines the student at the Claremont Colleges and characterizes the way in which he or she self-actualizes. It is anticipated that these results will have little applicability to outside populations or even to Claremont College students ten years from now.

            In order to seriously establish this study's concept of self actualization as a generalizable one, it must be tested against more popular and established approaches. Research must be done comparing people's score on self actualization as defined by the present study and their scores on measures and interviews created by theorists such as Maslow's, Roger's, and Ryff's. If these analyses prove no correlation exists between a person's score on the present measure of self actualization and that person's score on more established ones, the concept of self-actualization will have to be re-examined from a more fundamental philosophical level. At the point at which the basic assumptions of all of these theories were discovered, appropriate language might be developed to describe positive psychological functioning along a new and distinct axis.

            This thesis, in a way, takes a modern look at the age old question, "What must I do to be saved?" As people we want to know what we must do to live the fullest life possible. Upon what areas of our lives must we focus to ensure that we have the most positive psychological functioning possible to us? The present pilot study takes a step towards understanding subjective human nature and the identification of life experiences that might help an individual to experience the  good life.

 

Acknowledgments

            I would like to thank the following people, in no particular order, for helping me realize this culmination of  my four year journey of learning about people and how we can go about living the good life: Richard Lewis, Bill Peterson, Robert Gable, Jerry Irish, Kathleen Wicker, and Steve Smith.

 


REFERENCES

Take me to the top

 

            Buhler, C. (1935) The Curve of Life as studied in biographies, Journal of Applied Psychology 19, 405-409.

            Diener, E., Diener, M., & Diener C. (1995). Factors Predicting the Subjective Well-Being of Nations.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 851-864.

            Donahue, M. & Benson, P. (1995) Religion and the well-being of adolescents. Journal of Social Issues. 51(2) 145-160.

            Erikson, E. (1959) Identity and the life cycle. Psychological issues, 1, 18-164.

            Gallup, G. (1984) Religion in America. Gallup Report

            Gilliland, B. ;James, R.; Bowman, J. (1989) Person Centered Counseling  in  Theories and Strategies in Counseling and Psychotherapy  (2nd. ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

            Greeley, A. (1975) The Sociology of the Paranormal: A reconnaissance. Sage Research Papers in the Social Sciences, Vol 3, series no. 90-023 (Studies in Religion and Ethnicity Series) Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

            Jahoda, M (1958). Current concept of positive mental health. New York: Basic Books

            Jansen, D., Knapp, R., & Knapp, L. (1976) Measurement of personality change in an alcoholic treatment program: Further validation of the Personal Orientation Dimensions. Educational & Psychological Measurement. 36(2) 505-507,

Larsen, J. (1979) Self Actualization as related to Frequency, Range, and Pattern of Religious Experience. Journal of Psychology and Theology. 7(1), 39-47.

Lehman, J. (1993) Self Actualization and the Study Abroad Experience. Unpublished manuscript,  Pomona College.

            Maslow, A. H. (1964) Religions values and peak experiences. Columbus Ohio: Ohio State University Press

            Maslow, A. H. (1968) Toward a psychology of being. Princeton: Van Nostrand.

            Maslow, A. H. (1970) Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.

            Maslow, A.H. (1971) The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. New York: The Viking Press.

            Meyers, D. & Diener, E. (1995). Who Is Happy?. Psychological Science, 6(1). 10-19.

            Neugarten, B., Havinghurts, R., & Tobin S. (1961) The Measurement of Life Satisfaction. Journal of Gerontology. 16, 134-143.

            Pavot W., Diener, E. & Fujiata, F. (1990) Extraversion and Happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 11 1299-1306.

            Poloma, Margaret M. Pendleton, Brian F. (1990) Religious domains and general well-being. Social Indicators Research. 22(3), 255-276.

Prince, R. & Savage, C. (1972) Mystical states and the concept of regression. in J. White (Ed.) The highest state of consciousness. New York: Anchor Books.

Rogers, C. R. (1961) On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

            Rogers, C. R. (1980) A way of Being. Boston: Houghton Mifflin

            Ryff, Carol. (1989). Happiness is Everything, or Is It? Exploration on the meaning of Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.

            Skolnick, N & Zuckerman, M. (1979) Marvin. Personality change in drug abusers: A comparison of therapeutic community and prison groups. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology. 47(4) 768-770

            Stark, R. (1965). A taxonomy of religious experience. The Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 5, 97-116

            Walsh, R. (1982) Psychedelics and psychological well-being. Journal of Humanistic Psychology.  22(3) 22-32.

            Young, R., & Crandall, R. (1984) Wilderness use and self-actualization. Journal of Leisure Research 16(2) 149-160.



Table 1

Take me to the top

 

MEAN SCORES FOR EACH SECTION

 

 Mean     Std Dev   Minimum   Maximum         N      Label

 

      72%        .12       .29          .93                   101  Self actualization

      22%        .18       .07          .67                   102  Illegal Drugs

      57%        .21       .17          1.01                 99    Legal drugs

      61%        .28       .10          1.00                104  Spirituality

      72%        .13       .23          1.00                101  Academics

      72%        .17       .31          1.00                104  Nature

      75%        .11       .44          1.00                104  Close Relationships


 

 

 


Table 2

Take me to the top

SPEARMAN CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS MATRIX

Spirituality                .20*              

Legal Drug                 -.24**             -.13

Use

Illegal Drug                -.10                 -.14                 .60**

Use

Close                           .27**               .14                   -.21*      -.18*

Relationships

Nature                        -.03                 .36**               .13          .19*        .23**

Academics                 .14                   -.23*               -.09      . 12           .20*            -13

                       

                                    Self Actua-     Spirituality   Legal     Illegal    Close              Nature

                                    lization                                      Drugs    Drugs    Relation-

                                                                                                                      ships

*= Significance is less than or equal to .o5                        (1-tailed)

**=significance is less than or equal to .01


 


Table 3

Take me to the top

 

Forced Entry Multiple Regression

Predictor Variables:             Standardized Beta    T-value          T -sig.

                                                                                                                                               

Spirituality                              .14                                         1.21                 .23                  

Legal Drugs                           -.20                                        -1.53               .13

Illegal Drugs                            .15                                         1.16                 .25

Close Relationships                .25                                         2.17                 .03

Nature Experiences             -.10                                        -.892               .37

Academics                             .15                                           1.37                 .17

Constant                                  1.4                                         62.71               .00

 



APPENDIX

Take me to the top

Section 2

 

Please answer the following questions regarding spiritual, mystical, and religious experiences.

 

1)Approximately how often would you say that you have a personal spiritual, mystical, or religious experience?

 

___ Never

___ Less than once a year

___ Once or twice a year

___ Once a month

___ Once a week

___ Several times a week

 

 

2)How significant are your spiritual, mystical, or religious experiences to you overall life?    Please circle one:

 

 

            1          2            3             4                5             6            7    

Not   Significant                                                                         Very

       At All                                                                               Significant

 

 

3)What are the three most common settings for your personal spiritual, mystical, or religious experiences:

 

__ When you are alone

__ When you are in groups (other than an organized religious community)

__ When you are in an organized religious community

__ When you are in nature

__ When you are using psychoactive drugs

__ When you are with one other person or a small group of people.

__ Other______________

__ Other______________

 

4)Have you recently (the past  three or four years) had a spiritual, mystical, or religious experience that has significantly altered the way you live your life?

 

Please answer the following questions regarding your use of psychoactive substances excluding medications prescribed to you by a doctor.

 

5)Using the following scale, please mark how often you use each of the substances listed below.

 

1= Never

2= Less than once a year

3= Once or twice a year

4= Once a month

5= Once a week

6= Several times a week

 

___ Caffeine, ephedrine

___ Tobacco

___ Alcohol

 

6)Please rank the top four factors that lead to your use of the above substances:

 

___ I do it with my friends                              ___ They are readily available

___ People in my family have used them    ___ I want to experiment

___ I want to more productive                                 ___ I use them to relax

___ I have a lot of stress and problems                  ___ I use them for spiritual

                  In my life                                                                    exploration

___ Just for fun                                                          ___ Other________________

___ Other_______________________   ___ Other________________

 

 

7)My use of some of these substances plays a significant role in my life.

Please circle one:

 

 

          1            2            3             4                5             6            7    

Not   Significant                                                                         Very

       At All                                                                               Significant

 

8)Using the following scale please mark how often you use each of the substances listed below.

 

1= Never

2= Less than once a year

3= Once or twice a year

4= Once a month

5= Once a week

6= Several times a week

 

 

__ Cocaine

__ Extasy

__ Inhalants

__ LSD, Psilocybin (magic mushrooms)

__ Marijuana

__ Methamphetamine

__ Nootropics (Smart drugs)

__ Opiates 

__ Hallucinogens not mentioned above

__ Amphetamines and stimulants not mentioned above.

__ Downers or Depressants not mentioned above.

__ Other_____________

__ Other_____________

 

9)Please rank the top four factors that lead to your use of the above substances:

 

___ I do it with my friends                              ___ They are readily available

___ People in my family have used them    ___ I want to experiment

___ I want to more productive                                 ___ I use them to relax

___ I have a lot of stress and problems                  ___ I use them for spiritual

            In my life                                                                     exploration

___ Just for fun                                                          ___ other________________

___ Other_______________________   ___ Other________________

 

10)My use of some of these substances plays a significant role in my life.

            Please circle one:

 

          1            2            3             4                5             6            7    

Not   Significant                                                                         Very

       At All                                                                               Significant

 

Please answer the following questions regarding your close relationships.

 

11)Are you currently involved in a close or intimate relationship with a significant other?       

            __Yes __No

 

12) How close do you feel  to the following people in your life? Please assign a number between one and five where 1=not close at all, and 5=very close.

 

__ Significant other

__ Friends    

__ Parents

__ Faculty/teachers

__ Other___________

 

13)How satisfied are you with your relationships with the following people in your life? Please assign a number between one and five where 1=not  satisfied at all, and 5=very satisfied.

 

__ Significant other

__ Friends    

__ Parents

__ Faculty/teachers

__ Other___________

 

14)To what extent are your relationships with the following people significant to your overall life? Please assign a number between one and five where 1=not significant at all, and 5=very significant.

 

__ Significant other

__ Friends    

__ Parents

__ Faculty/teachers

__ Other___________

 

Please answer the following questions concerning your experiences in nature. For purposes of this study, nature experiences are those experiences in which your exposure to or interaction with a natural setting has a significant effect on your immediate state of being.

 

15)Approximately how often would you say that you have experiences in nature?

 

___ Never

___ Less than once a year

___ Once or twice a year

___ Once a month

___ Once a week

___ Several times a week

 

 

16)How significant are your experiences in nature to your overall life?

Please circle one:

 

          1            2            3             4                5             6            7    

Not   Significant                                                                         Very

       At All                                                                               Significant

 

Please answer the following questions regarding your academic experiences since you have come to college.

 

17)How important are your academic pursuits to you? Please circle one:

 

          1            2            3             4                5             6            7    

Not   Important                                                                           Very

       At All                                                                               Important

 

 

18)on average how many hours per/week do you spend on schoolwork? Including the number of hours you typically spend in the class room

 

___ 0-5                       ___ 25-30                  ___ More than 47

___ 6-12                    ___ 31-36

___ 13-18                  ___ 37-43

___ 19-24                  ___ 47

 

19)How important is success in your academic career to you? Please circle one:

 

          1            2            3             4                5             6            7    

Not   Important                                                                           Very

       At All                                                                               Important

 

 

 

Section 3

 

Please answer the following questions concerning your life in general

 

21)To what extent do you feel that you have achieved significant personal growth since entering college? Please circle one:

 

 1             2               3                4                   5                           6                   7       

I have not                                                                                                        I have grown

grown at all                                                                                                     significantly

 

 

Here are some statements about life in general that people feel differently about. Would you read each statement on this list, and if you agree with it, put a check mark in the space next  to AGREE. If you do not agree with a statement, put a check mark in the space next  to DISAGREE. If you are not sure one way or the other, put a check mark in the space next  to "?".

 

22)As I grow older things seem better than I thought  they would be.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?                                 

 

23)I have gotten more out of the breaks in life than most of the people I know.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?

 

24)This is the dreariest time of my life.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?

 

25)I am just as happy as when I was younger.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?

 

26)My life could be happier than it is right now.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?

 

27)These are the best years of my life.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?

 

28)Most of the things I do are boring or monotonous.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?

 

29)I expect some interesting and pleasant things to happen to me in the near future.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?

 

30)The things I do are as interesting now as they ever were.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?

 

31)I feel old and somewhat tired.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?

 

32)I feel my age, but it does not bother me.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?

 

 

33)As I look back on my life, I am fairly well satisfied.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?

 

34)I would not change my past life even if I could.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?

 

35)Compared to other people my age, I've made a lot of foolish decisions in my life.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?  

 

36)Compared to other people my age, I've make a good appearance.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?  

 

37)I have made plans for things I'll be doing a  month or a year from now.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?  

 

38)When I think back over my life, I didn't get most of the important things I wanted.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?  

 

39)Compared to other people I get down in the dumps too often.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?  

 

40)I've gotten pretty much what I expected out of life.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?  

 

41)In spite of what people say, the lot of the average man is getting worse, not better.

  ___Agree                ____Disagree          _____?  

 

 

 

 



[1]When studies directly examining the relationship between self-actualization and these experiences were not readily available the concept of subjective well-being was substituted. This was done because a person's subjective level of satisfaction with his or her life is the closest indirect measure of self-actualization as defined by this study. Wherever possible, studies that included personal growth as well as subjective well-being were included.

+ نوشته شده در  پنجشنبه بیست و یکم اردیبهشت 1385ساعت 11:55  توسط علی  | 

An Overview of Self-Concept Theory for Counselors

Reference: Purkey, W. (1988). An Overview of Self-Concept Theory for Counselors. ERIC Clearinghouse on Counseling and Personnel Services, Ann Arbor, Mich. (An ERIC/CAPS Digest: ED304630)


Return to: | Self-Concept/Self-Esteem | The Regulatory System |


After more than a decade of relative neglect, self-concept is enjoying renewed popularity and attention by both researchers and practitioners. There is growing awareness that of all the perceptions we experience in the course of living, none has more profound significance than the perceptions we hold regarding our own personal existence--our concept of who we are and how we fit into the world.

Self-concept may be defined as the totality of a complex, organized, and dynamic system of learned beliefs, attitudes and opinions that each person holds to be true about his or her personal existence. Self-concept is different from self-esteem (feelings of personal worth and level of satisfaction regarding one's self) or self-report (what a person is willing and able to disclose). Fromm (1956) was as beautifully clear as anyone when he described self-concept as "life being aware of itself."

Brief History of Self-Concept Theory

A milestone in human reflection about the non-physical inner self came in 1644, when Rene Descartes wrote Principles of Philosophy. Descartes proposed that doubt was a principal tool of disciplined inquiry, yet he could not doubt that he doubted. He reasoned that if he doubted, he was thinking, and therefore he must exist. Thus existence depended upon perception.

A second milestone in the development of self-concept theory was the writing of Sigmund Freud (1900) who gave us new understanding of the importance of internal mental processes. While Freud and many of his followers hesitated to make self-concept a primary psychological unit in their theories, Freud's daughter Anna (1946) gave central importance to ego development and self-interpretation.

Self-concept theory has always had a strong influence on the emerging profession of counseling. Prescott Lecky (1945) contributed the notion that self-consistency is a primary motivating force in human behavior. Raimy (1948) introduced measures of self-concept in counseling interviews and argued that psychotherapy is basically a process of altering the ways that individuals see themselves.

By far the most influential and eloquent voice in self-concept theory was that of Carl Rogers (1947) who introduced an entire system of helping built around the importance of the self. In Rogers' view, the self is the central ingredient in human personality and personal adjustment. Rogers described the self as a social product, developing out of interpersonal relationships and striving for consistency. He maintained that there is a basic human need for positive regard both from others and from oneself. He also believed that in every person there is a tendency towards self-actualization and development so long as this is permitted and encouraged by an inviting environment (Purkey & Schmidt, 1987).

While most self-concept theorists continued to write and conduct research during the 1970's and 1980's, general interest in self-concept declined. In a recent article explaining the likely causes for the decline of "humanistic" education, Patterson (1987) presents reasons for the decline of interest in self-concept as well. He offers four likely causes:

1. A cornucopia of contrived games, gimmicks, and techniques that were introduced and controlled by unprepared professionals.

2. A national mood of "back to basics" in education prevailed where concern for the emotional needs of students was viewed as inimical to academic excellence.

3. Poor judgment by counselors and teachers in selecting suitable materials for values clarification programs resulted in public opposition to any attempt to introduce values in school.

4. Strong opposition by those who objected to any consideration of personal development of students because they believed it to be secular humanism and, therefore, an effort to undermine religion.

Fortunately, there is a new awareness on the part of both the public and professionals that self-concept cannot be ignored if we are to successfully address such nagging problems as drug and alcohol abuse, drop-out rates, dysfunctional families, and other concerns. In addition to this growing awareness, new ways are being developed to strengthen self-concepts. For example, research by cognitive theorists (McAdam, 1986; Ryan, Short & Weed, 1986) are demonstrating that negative self-talk leads to irrational thinking regarding oneself and the world.

Some Basic Assumptions Regrading Self-Concept

Many of the successes and failures that people experience in many areas of life are closely related to the ways that they have learned to view themselves and their relationships with others. It is also becoming clear that self-concept has at least three major qualities of interest to counselors: (1) it is learned, (2) it is organized, and (3) it is dynamic. Each of these qualities, with corollaries, follow.

Self-concept is learned. As far as we know, no one is born with a self-concept. It gradually emerges in the early months of life and is shaped and reshaped through repeated perceived experiences, particularly with significant others. The fact that self-concept is learned has some important implications:

  • Because self-concept does not appear to be instinctive, but is a social product developed through experience, it possesses relatively boundless potential for development and actualization.
  • Because of previous experiences and present perceptions, individuals may perceive themselves in ways different from the ways others see them.
  • Individuals perceive different aspects of themselves at different times with varying degrees of clarity. Therefore, inner focusing is avaluable tool for counseling.
  • Any experience which is inconsistent with one's self-concept may be perceived as a threat, and the more of these experiences there are, the more rigidly self-concept is organized to maintain and protect itself. When a person is unable to get rid of perceived inconsistencies, emotional problems arise.
  • Faulty thinking patterns, such as dichotomous reasoning (dividing everything in terms of opposites or extremes) or overgeneralizing (making sweeping conclusions based on little information) create negative interpretations of oneself.

Self-Concept is organized. Most researchers agree that self-concept has a generally stable quality that is characterized by orderliness and harmony. Each person maintains countless perceptions regarding one's personal existence, and each perception is orchestrated with all the others. It is this generally stable and organized quality of self-concept that gives consistency to the personality. This organized quality of self-concept has corollaries.

  • Self-concept requires consistency, stability, and tends to resist change. If self-concept changed readily, the individual would lack a consistent and dependable personality.
  • The more central a particular belief is to one's self-concept, the more resistant one is to changing that belief.
  • At the heart of self-concept is the self-as-doer, the "I," which is distinct from the self-as-object, the various "me's." This allows the person to reflect on past events, analyze present perceptions, and shape future experiences.
  • Basic perceptions of oneself are quite stable, so change takes time. Rome was not built in a day, and neither is self-concept.
  • Perceived success and failure impact on self-concept. Failure in a highly regarded area lowers evaluations in all other areas as well.

Success in a prized area raises evaluations in other seemingly unrelated areas.

Self-Concept is dynamic. To understand the active nature of self-concept, it helps to imagine it as a gyrocompass: a continuously active system that dependably points to the "true north" of a person's perceived existence. This guidance system not only shapes the ways a person views oneself, others, and the world, but it also serves to direct action and enables each person to take a consistent "stance" in life. Rather than viewing self-concept as the cause of behavior, it is better understood as the gyrocompass of human personality, providing consistency in personality and direction for behavior. The dynamic quality of self-concept also carries corollaries.

  • The world and the things in it are not just perceived; they are perceived in relation to one's self-concept.
  • Self-concept development is a continuous process. In the healthy personality there is constant assimilation of new ideas and expulsion of old ideas throughout life.
  • Individuals strive to behave in ways that are in keeping with their self-concepts, no matter how helpful or hurtful to oneself or others.
  • Self-concept usually takes precedence over the physical body. Individuals will often sacrifice physical comfort and safety for emotional satisfaction.
  • Self-concept continuously guards itself against loss of self-esteem, for it is this loss that produces feelings of anxiety.
  • If self-concept must constantly defend itself from assault, growth opportunities are limited.

Summary

This brief overview of self-concept theory has focused on describing the ways people organize and interpret their inner world of personal existence. The beginnings of self-concept theory and its recent history have been discussed. Three major qualities of self-concept--that it is: (1) learned, (2) organized, and (3) dynamic--have been presented. Individuals have within themselves relatively boundless potential for developing a positive and realistic self-concept. This potential can be realized by people, places, policies, programs, and processes that are intentionally designed to invite the realization of this potential.

Resource Documents

Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. In the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. London: The Hogarth Press, 1962.

Fromm, E. (1956). The art of loving. New York: Harper & Row.

Hamachek, D. E. (1978). Encounters with the self (2nd ed.). New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

Jourard, S. (1971). Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

Lecky, P. (1945). Self-consistency: A theory of personality. New York: Island Press.

McAdam, E. K. (1986). Cognitive behavior therapy and its application with adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 1-15.

Patterson, C. H. (1961). The self in recent Rogerian theory. Journal of Individual Psychology, 17, 5-11.

Purkey, W. W., & Schmidt, J. (1987). The inviting relationship: An expanded perspective for professional counseling. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Raimy, V. C. (1948). Self-reference in counseling interviews. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 12, 153-163.

Rogers, C. R. (1947). Some observations on the organization of personality. American Psychologist, 2, 358-368.

Ryan, E. B., Short, E. J., & Weed, K. A. (1986). The role of cognitive strategy training in improving the academic performance of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 521-529.


William W. Purkey is Professor of Counselor Education University of North Carolina at Greensboro

This digest was created by ERIC, the Educational Resources Information Center. For more information about ERIC contact ACCESS ERIC 1-800-LET-ERIC.

This publication was prepared with funding from the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, under contract no. RI88062011. The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of OERI or the Department of Education.

 


Return to: | Educational Psychology Interactive | Bill Huitt's Home Page |


+ نوشته شده در  پنجشنبه بیست و یکم اردیبهشت 1385ساعت 11:47  توسط علی  | 

 
NW Laboratory Home

School Improvement Research Series
(SIRS)

Research You Can Use



Snapshot #25

Building Positive Student Self-Concept

Stevenson-Carson School District
Stevenson, Washington

Kathleen Cotton

The Schooling Practices That Matter Most
The schooling practices that matter most

View details »

by Kathleen Cotton

Non-Member Price: $7.50

Member Price: $6.75

addAdd to cart

View all School Improvement products


RESEARCH FINDINGS

"GOAL #1: STUDENTS WILL HAVE A POSITIVE SELF-CONCEPT."

When the staff and community of the Stevenson-Carson School District established this goal and gave it top priority, they were responding to three influences:

  • Widespread agreement in the school and community that positive student self-concept is of primary importance
  • District data indicating that improvement was needed in this area
  • Research data showing the critical importance of a positive self-concept for success in school and in life.

Focusing on the support provided by research, it can readily been seen that many effective educational practices are typically in operation in schools and districts whose students have positive self-regard. The document, EFFECTIVE SCHOOLING PRACTICES: A RESEARCH SYNTHESIS/1990 UPDATE (Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, April 1990), identifies the following practices as being particularly relevant to enhancing student self-concept:

At the classroom level:

1.2.1 INSTRUCTIONAL GROUPS FORMED IN THE CLASSROOM FIT STUDENTS' ACADEMIC AND AFFECTIVE NEEDS

1.3.4 STUDENTS ROUTINELY RECEIVE FEEDBACK AND REINFORCEMENT REGARDING THEIR LEARNING PROGRESS

1.4.1 THERE ARE HIGH EXPECTATIONS FOR STUDENT LEARNING

1.4.3 PERSONAL INTERACTIONS BETWEEN TEACHERS AND STUDENTS ARE POSITIVE

1.6.1 STUDENTS AT RISK OF SCHOOL FAILURE ARE GIVEN THE EXTRA TIME AND HELP THEY NEED TO SUCCEED.

At the school level:

2.1.1 EVERYONE EMPHASIZES THE IMPORTANCE OF LEARNING

2.2.4 THERE ARE PLEASANT CONDITIONS FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING

2.4.2 INCENTIVES AND REWARDS ARE USED TO BUILD STRONG STUDENT AND STAFF MOTIVATION

2.6.1 STUDENTS AT RISK OF SCHOOL FAILURE ARE PROVIDED PROGRAMS TO HELP THEM SUCCEED

2.7.1 PARENTS AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS ARE INVITED TO BECOME INVOLVED.

At the district level:

3.1.1 HIGH EXPECTATIONS PERVADE THE ORGANIZATION

3.1.2 THERE ARE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES THAT SUPPORT EXCELLENCE IN STUDENT PERFORMANCE

3.4.1 IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS ARE ENCOURAGED, SUPPORTED, AND MONITORED.

@@


SITUATION

The Stevenson-Carson School District is a consolidated district made up of many small communities. Located in the "windsurfing capital of the world"-the Columbia River Gorge-the district serves approximately 1100 students in two elementary schools, a middle school, and a high school. Some 95 percent of StevensonCarson' s students are white/non-Hispanic. The teacherstudent ratio is one to twenty-three or less at all grade levels.

Skamania County, in which the school district is located, has had the highest unemployment in the state of Washington for a number of years, due primarily to the general decline in the logging and wood products industries in the Pacific Northwest. While the unemloy-ment rate over the last ten years has averaged approximately 15 percent, at this writing it has reached nearly 30 percent. Other developments, such as a recently erected convention center and the designation of the Columbia Gorge as a National Scenic Area, are expected to reinvigorate the local economy, but their effect has not yet been significantly felt.

@@


CONTEXT

BELIEFS ABOUT EDUCATIONAL IMPROVEMENT

When Stevenson-Carson superintendent Tony Feldhausen became aware of NWREL's strategic improvement process, CREATING THE FUTURE (CTF), central office and schoollevel staff in his district were already engaged in research-based school improvement projects and had undertaken some of the components of strategic planning. Feldhausen and special programs supervisor Mollie Lopshire had, for example, provided Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement (TESA) training to a number of the district's teachers. They had provided classes in the development of collaborative staff relationships, cooperative learning, and the use of research-based practices in lesson design. Small grants were also offered by the district for teachers to develop and improve these practices in their own areas of responsibility. The district had provided staff development activities for instructional assistants as well. In addition, administrators and teachers had been involved in direction setting, visioning, studying the change process, and reviewing/sharing research on effective schooling practices.

Reading a journal article about the CTF process, Tony Feldhausen saw a high degree of congruence between CTF and his district's current efforts. And since he and his staff wanted to take a more structured and systematic approach to districtwide school improvement, Feldhausen contacted NWREL and, together with supportive staff and community members, embarked on the CTF approach to districtwide school improvement.

Why did Stevenson-Carson stakeholders feel the CTF process was right for the district? The answer lies in the following list of philosophical and procedural features, which characterize both the district's direction and the CTF strategic improvement approach:

  • All stakeholder groups in the district-board members, administrators, teachers, noncertified staff, parents, other community members, and students-should have a voice in planning and decision making.
  • The improvement process should be led by a team responsible for guiding the effort, engaging the participation of school and community people, and keeping all stakeholder groups informed of activities and progress.
  • Plans and decisions should be made based on their potential for improving outcomes for all students, including those identified as "at risk."
  • Plans and decisions should be made based on knowledge of validated schooling practices as identified in the educational research base.
  • Plans and decisions should be data based; that is, based on information about current student performance and community priorities.
  • The role of central office personnel is to inspire and provide support for school-based management.
  • Proposed improvement activities have the best chance for success when staff engage in collegial planning and projects.
  • Real and lasting change occurs slowly, and those engaged in a change process can expect to encounter obstacles along the road to achieving their goals.

THE FOCUS ON STUDENT SELF-CONCEPT

With assistance and support from NWREL staff, a broad base of district, school, and community representatives initiated a district-wide improvement effort in the manner specified by the CTF process. Guided by the district leadership team, this group developed a mission statement, a vision statement, and five student goal statements, with the development of positive student self-concept as the first priority goal.

Why self-concept? As planners utilized the CTF processes for identifying needs, determining their relative importance, and reviewing relevant research, they came to appreciate the critical role of positive self-concept in the school performance and overall well-being of students. In particular, they came to understand the close relationship between positive self-concept and academic achievement. They also became very concerned about the negative influences on self-concept experienced by many Stevenson-Carson students due to widespread economic hardship and its attendant family problems-drug/alcohol abuse, domestic violence, and depression.

Leadership team members and stakeholders developed and refined an action plan aimed at enhancing student selfconcept. At the same time, they specified measurable academic, behavioral, and affective indicators of selfconcept in order to be able to monitor progress toward the goal.

In keeping with the evidence that locally managed improvement efforts have the greatest likelihood of success, staff of each of the district's four schools were given the responsibility and the authority to develop their own plans and activities for improving the self-concepts of students within that school. Stakeholders did agree, however, that efforts to enhance self-concept should not take the form of separate programs. Rather, the use of research-based methods and techniques for building positive selfconcepts should be integrated into all aspects of the school program.

Both the educational research base and the experience of Stevenson-Carson educators pointed to the critical importance of adequate information, support, and resources in order for improvement efforts to succeed. Consequently, district personnel worked to give the self-concept development effort high visibility throughout the district and made themselves available to provide training and technical assistance to staff of each school as they planned and launched their activities.

For their part, board members approved the provision of release time to assure that staff development and training activities could take place, established criteria for assessing the level of caring and empathy exhibited by teachers seeking employment within the district, and authorized grant moneys for implementing action plans.

@@


PRACTICE: ACTIVITIES TO
BUILD POSITIVE STUDENT SELF-CONCEPT

Visiting classrooms, talking with teachers, and observing school activities in process provided a wealth of information about each school's approach to fostering positive self-regard in its students.

STEVENSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Ms. Jodi Thompson, a fifth grade teacher at Stevenson Elementary School, opened her classroom for observation as she conducted a Student Circle activity. Students were given the opportunity to offer one another support or advice, and to express "resentments" or "appreciations" they might have on their minds.

First came a review of the school's guidelines for interpersonal interactions and other behaviors. In response to Ms. Thompson's queries about the guidelines, students enthusiastically raised their hands, were recognized, and identified the following:

  • Striving for one's "personal best," explained by one student as, "not your neighbor's best, but your own"
  • Avoiding "put-downs," including a short discussion of "how put-downs make people feel bad"
  • Everyone's "right to pass"; that is, each person's freedom to "pass" on suggestions or invitations that he/she knows or suspects are harmful, such as using drugs
  • Telling the truth
  • Building trust for one another
  • Engaging in "active listening," which students demonstrated by looking at each speaker and communicating attentiveness with their body language.

Ms. Thompson thanked each student as he or she shared, and then directed the class's attention to the classroom "put-up" box. The opposite of put-downs, put-ups are messages of thanks or appreciation that students had written to one another or to Ms. Thompson and placed in a box specified for that purpose. As the box was passed from student to student and the put-up messages were read, there was much laughter and good cheer. "How does it feel to be put-up this morning, guys?" asked Ms. Thompson, to which responses of "Good!" and "Great!" could be heard.

An additional noteworthy feature of this class is that special education students could not be distinguished from their classmates.

Ms. Annette Medlin and Ms. Sue Lofberg, Stevenson Elementary teachers who applied for and received SelfConcept Grants from the district, discussed their selfconcept development activities.

One use to which the grant resources have been put is the development and implementation of Arts Afternoons, a program grounded in Dr. Howard Gardner's concept of multiple intelligences. Ms. Lofberg explained that program students, many of whom have been identified as being at risk of school failure, interact with teachers, classified staff, senior citizens, and area artists as they express themselves through a variety of artistic media. Both visual and performing arts are emphasized. "Our intent is to enhance self-esteem using artistic expression as our vehicle," reads the grant proposal, which also provides the research evidence (as required of grant applicants) showing that activities such as those proposed have led to increases in student self-esteem in other settings.

Arts Afternoons activities conclude with a "Show Off" of artistic products, in which students display or perform their work for school and community people. An impressive mural developed by Arts Afternoons participants decorates an expanse of wall in one of Stevenson's hallways.

Arts Afternoons is characterized by frequent evaluations, involving its student participants, of how the program is going-which activities have gone well, what needs to be changed, and solicitation of suggestions for ways the program might be improved. Student input is taken to heart and has been a major ingredient in shaping the program.

Ms. Annette Medlin's grant supported the development of Stevenson's "Record of Achievement" for students in grades K-3. In keeping with recent research favoring the use of performance-based assessment methods rather than relying on standardized testing, the Record of Achievement focuses on student demonstrations of skills they have acquired. A key element is an alternative report card which identifies the large array of learning areas and subskills presented to and acquired by children during their primary years. The card notes skills introduced and skills mastered, and includes indications of the student's level of effort. Reviewing Record of Achievement reports with their child and his/her teacher, parents get a much more complete picture of the child's learning progress than that offered by more traditional report cards.

The Record of Achievement also includes samples of student work, many of which are selected for inclusion by the student. In addition to the periodic parentteacher -student conferences, there are frequent conferences between teacher and student, in which student work samples are reviewed and, as the original grant proposal specifies, "a teacher must assess nonjudgmentally and gently and respectfully critique but not criticize." Having the opportunity to review his/her own cumulative record, says Ms. Medlin, "enhances self-concept by showing the student's growth and progress over time."

Another of Stevenson Elementary School's approaches to building student self-concept is through the KLUE (Kids Like Us are Everywhere) program, a 12-week class for children whose parents have drug or alcohol problems. Participants are self-selected initially and continue in the program if parent permission is granted. A tracking system is being used to determine whether involvement in the program reduces or delays the use of drugs and alcohol by participants.

CARSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Carson Elementary principal Chris Whetzel speaks of the school's self-esteem-building activities with a great deal of pride. He described the Kids Care program, in which each classroom of students, together with their parents, teacher, and instructional assistants, participates in an array of self-esteem-building activities while on a day-long retreat at a Forest Service retreat center.

When a Carson student is selected as Citizen of the Week, Mr. Whetzel calls his or her parents and draws their attention to the positive things their child has done to receive this honor. And in Carson's VIP (Very Important Person) classroom activities, students have the opportunity-one at a time in each class-to select and portray pictures which reflect the things each child feels are important about him/herself-pictures of family activities, sports participation, and other elements of the child's life. Not far from a VIP Board in one second grade classroom, the following affirmation was displayed on the wall:

I am the one and only me. I am an important person. I like myself. When I really like myself, others will like me, too. I am responsible for what I do and the kind of person I am. I am special.

As a complement to the many brief overviews of activities taking place at Carson, a visit with veteran sixth grade teacher Mary Frenter provided an in-depth look at the way self-esteem-building activities are integrated into the work of one teacher. Ms. Frenter made no secret of the fact that, at the beginning of the current school year, her class was "unruly" and fraught with social interaction problems. She also made it clear that this is no longer the case. Asked what she does to ameliorate a difficult situation like this, she launched into a description of the many activities she conducts to enhance students' selfregard and help them build skills in interacting positively with one another. These include:

  • Explaining and reinforcing her classroom's guiding principles: "Integrity, Kindness, and Respect."
  • Weekly "spotlighting" of a given student, during which the other students write and communicate positive things about the week's featured student.
  • Teaching students the importance of "seeing the good in one another" and continuously encouraging them to do so.
  • Frequently changing the seating arrangement in the classroom and having students observe and make positive observations about their new "neighbors."
  • Participating with her class in the Kids Care program.
  • Displaying a "Put-Up Board," on which the positive comments students write about one another are posted.
  • Teaching the use of "snakes": When students hear comments that sound like put-downs, they are encouraged to make a hissing sound and a "snake" gesture-holding one's hand with the index and middle fingers partially extended, as if they were the fangs of a snake. In this somewhat whimsical way, they can signal their unwillingness to listen to or participate in spiteful talk.
  • Making use of a classroom "Me Board," which is similar to the VIP Board used in some others of Carson's classes, but somewhat more complex, befitting the greater maturity of these students. Me Board displays feature both pictures and words, with descriptions and images revealing the student's plans, hopes, and dreams, as well as their present circumstances. Each student presents his or her Me Board display to the whole class.
  • Carrying out a practice whereby students who are disruptive must leave the room and are allowed to rejoin the class only after an analysis and improvement plan are made.
  • Frequently focusing on helping students to see how their behavior impacts others.
  • Having students "make appointments" with their parents to discuss things of importance to them.
  • Encouraging parent participants in the school's open house to leave "warm fuzzies"-notes of praise and affection-in their children's desks.
  • Working with parents in a program called "Preparing for the Drug-Free Years," in which parents learn how to deal constructively with their own emotions, solve problems, and develop greater understanding of young people through role-playing.
  • Providing classroom activities to help students to manage their own anger and deal with the anger of others
  • Teaching "politeness skills," for example, discussing the importance of both a person's words and tone of voice in conveying meaning. Students are encouraged to seek a "reality check" when they are unsure about what another person's tone of voice might mean.
  • Recognizing that "we all feel sorry for ourselves sometimes" and permitting students to have "pity parties"-periods of self-indulgent sulking-for a maximum of 45 minutes.
  • Teaching the importance of learning from failure. "I'm going to teach you how to fail," Ms. Frenter says, explaining that students, particularly those inclined to be perfectionists, need to learn that "the world doesn't end if you don't do everything perfectly."
  • Making use of an array of activities from the resource book, GO FOR IT!, which was developed with gifted children in mind, but which Ms. Frenter has found to be appropriate for all students.
  • Focusing on elements from William Glasser's Reality Therapy, which identifies "love, power, fun, and freedom" as basic human needs. When students are having problems, Ms. Frenter works with them to analyze their experience in order to see which of these elements might be insufficient. Each student develops "My Basic Needs Circle," and this is used to help them create a better balance among their needs.
  • Having students put items of their choice in a "time capsule," which she keeps and then shares with students when they become seniors in high school.
  • Offering opportunities for students to earn recess time.

And more. Asked what designation she gives to this program of self-understanding and improved self-regard for students, Ms. Frenter says, "I don't know what to call it-health? science? social studies? I can't say; I just do it, and it works."

WIND RIVER MIDDLE SCHOOL

The district's seventh and eighth graders attend Wind River Middle School and, as part of the school's approach to developing student self-concept, spend 30 minutes each day in a program called Home Base. The purpose of Home Base is to make certain that every Wind River student has a personal and ongoing relationship with a school staff member. Home Base groups are limited to 14 members, and attempts are made to group together students who are not already established friends. Time in Home Base is spent working on listening skills and other interpersonal skills, and students engage in short activities from the "Ropes" curriculum, which focuses on building trust, interdependency, and positive self-regard. Home Base teachers are alerted when their students are falling behind in their assignments and take action to assist and encourage them.

A different but complementary approach to developing students' self-esteem is the "cross-age coaching" program co-developed by Wind River physical education teacher Tracy Jennings and a teacher from Carson Elementary School next door. A course in which the two teachers were involved required that they design an innovative course. From their collaboration emerged a physical education course in which Wind River students develop and carry out lesson plans for teaching and coaching the younger Carson children in a variety of sports activities.

Outcomes of this activity have surpassed the teachers' hopes and expectations. Wind River students, particularly those who had a history of behavior problems, have experienced a great deal of success in developing leadership skills as they provide guidance and support to the younger children. Many have said that their teaching/coaching experience has made them more understanding about the discipline problems teachers face. For their part, the younger children respond well to taking direction from the older students and express feeling important and special because of the attention and help given them.

During the observation, groups of Wind River students could be seen playing with groups of Carson children in several different indoor and outdoor activities-golf, soccer, tennis, basketball, and volleyball. In the team sports, each team was made up of both older and younger students, with the older students being attentive to their younger classmates, coaching, encouraging, cheering successes, and providing reassurance following misplaced kicks or missed baskets.

STEVENSON HIGH SCHOOL

The action plan for enhancing the self-concepts of Stevenson High School students has components ranging from student recognition activities to counseling activities in a variety of areas to programs designed to build students' academic self-confidence and success. Developed in response to research findings on effective practices, examples of programs and activities include:

  • A Student of the Month program, featuring public recognition at a school assembly and breakfast as the guest of the principal, Jim Saltness.
  • An annual Evening of Excellence event, during which students exemplifying excellence in different areas are recognized.
  • A program for identifying and planning support activities for students who are experiencing academic, behavioral, or attendance difficulties.
  • Drug and alcohol aftercare for students requiring ongoing support after substance abuse treatment.
  • A Peer Helpers program, which trains students in helping, communication, and problem-solving skills so as to be effective in assisting their schoolmates in need of support.
  • A support group for parents focused on sharing problems and successes.
  • Study skills development activities provided to help freshmen get off to a good start academically.
  • Community volunteer tutors who make themselves available to assist students needing help with school work and provide other kinds of assistance to teachers and administrators.

An in-depth look at just one of Stevenson's programs was provided by Mr. Saltness and technology education/industrial arts teacher Bill LaCombe, who described the school's Summer Success Program.

Initiated during the summer just past, Summer Success is an eight-week program jointly financed by the school district and the Community Foundation of Southwest Washington. Participants include both successful and at-risk students, who are paid for their involvement in the all-day, five-days-a-week program activities. Twothirds of the 19 summer 1992 participants were selected based on factors such as low socioeconomic status, parental unemployment, poor attendance, behavior problems, and academic difficulties. The other thirdthe "role model" students-were selected based on having a history of school success. Summer Success activities included:

  • Morning "icebreaker" lessons, such as challenging students with puzzles or mysteries to be solved using inquiry skills.
  • Mathematics and language assignments set in real contexts that are meaningful to students. One such activity called for students to work cooperatively to prepare a written proposal for paving the school parking lot, including the computations for materials needs and costs.
  • Ropes program activities aimed at building trust; e.g., a group of students holding another student off the ground, passing the student safely from one point to another.
  • Day Camp leadership functions, in which Summer Success participants planned, practiced, and carried out activities for 60 children in grades K-6.

How did it turn out? Mr. LaCombe notes that there was distance and some friction between the at-risk and the successful students at the beginning of the summer activity, and that a few of the at-risk students never really became fully engaged in the program. For the most part, however, the goal of building trust and bonds between members of the two groups was met, and the attendance of many of the at-risk students has improved following involvement in the program.

"When I first came to Stevenson," says Mr. LaCombe, "I thought it would be a short stop for me. Now, I don't see myself leaving here anytime soon. I'm proud to be a Bulldog. The staff work together like a family. In Summer Success I learned a lot about the hardships many students face. I have become more compassionate, and I make myself more available to my students. These ‘atrisk' kids know a lot; they teach me things."

@@


OUTCOMES

Although the focused efforts to raise the self-esteem of Stevenson-Carson students have been in operation only a short time, staff have a wealth of anecdotal information about the positive effects of these efforts. Teacher surveys, for example, point to improved self-regard among students and indicate that teacher-student bonds have been strengthened.

Perhaps more to the point, however, are the findings concerning the indicators specified at the beginning of the improvement effort. Some highlights:

  • Dropouts. The 1986-90 dropout rate averaged 8.75 percent. The 1990-91 dropout figure was 5.7 percent.
  • Attendance. From the 1989-90 to the 1990-91 school year, average attendance at the elementary level increased slightly, decreased slightly at the middle school level, and increased significantly at the senior high level.
  • Achievement. Of the many positive achievement indicators tracked by Stevenson-Carson staff, some are particularly noteworthy, including a dramatic reduction in the class failure rate of middle school students and a significant increase in the standardized reading comprehension scores of senior high students.
  • Referrals. From 1989-90 to 1990-91 there was a 19 percent decrease in the number of senior high students receiving referrals and a 33 percent decrease in the number of middle school students receiving referrals.
  • Student Perceptions. Average responses of middle school students to questions about staff acceptance, caring, and support of them improved dramatically from the period 1987-90 to the 1990-91 school year.

As Stevenson-Carson district-level and school-level staff have written and implemented action plans in other goal areas-skill development, knowledge acquisition, motivation, and values-they have taken care to continue their focus on building student selfconcept. Speaking of the key role of positive staffstudent interactions in building self-esteem,
superintendent Tony Feldhausen quotes a bit of proverbial wisdom: "Students don't care how much you know, until they know how much you care."

Contact Tony Feldhausen, Superintendent, StevensonCarson School District, P.O. Box 850, Stevenson, Washington 98648, 509/427-5674, for more information on the district's activities for improving student selfconcept. For more information on the CREATING THE FUTURE strategic improvement process, contact NWREL staff members, Robert E. Blum (503/275-9615) or Thomas A. Olson (503/275-9644).


This publication is based on work sponsored wholly, or in part, by the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education, under Contract Number RP91002001. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views of OERI, the Department, or any other agency of the U.S. Government.

April 1993


This document's URL is: file:///D:/007/Building%20Positive%20Student%20Self-Concept.htm

Home | Up & Coming | Programs & Projects: School Improvement | People | Products & Publications | Topics

© 2001 Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory

Date of Last Update: 8/31/01
Email
Webmaster
Tel. 503.275.9500

NW Lab Home
+ نوشته شده در  پنجشنبه بیست و یکم اردیبهشت 1385ساعت 11:46  توسط علی  | 

 

 
Home > < Search
 Self Concept

Pragmatic View of Self

The self is a complex process of gaining self awareness. We develop a concept of who we are through our interactions with others. This view is expressed in pragmatic philosophy in the works of Willliam James and George Herbert Mead, among others.

Dramatism and Self-Presentation

We construct roles that we perform in the everyday drama of life and shape the image we choose to convey to others.

The Humanistic View of Self 

Drawing on perspectives of Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers, this view of self emphasizes individual growth toward self-actualization.

Postmodern Self

Our sense of self is a relational view that is defined and negotiated in relational communities.

 Self-Esteem

Esteem is the need to affirm self worth and gain confidence in interacting with others. This focus also draws on humanistic psychology.

 cultural context | self | relational development | listening & perception | messages | relationships
Copyright, 2000-05 by Terrence A. Doyle, Ph. D.
Feedback to tdoyle@nvcc.edu
Last Modified 05/11/2006 12:34:58
+ نوشته شده در  پنجشنبه بیست و یکم اردیبهشت 1385ساعت 11:46  توسط علی  | 

[Image]

self-esteem  / self concept........ .Talent Development Resources --..home page...site map




    Pierce Brosnan

I know what it’s like to loathe oneself. To feel that deep self-loathing.

It’s painful and ugly and f**ing unwanted. And it got in the way.
I can dip in there, into the old black-Irish melancholy.

You think “Am I smart enough? Am I equipped enough to deal with it all?” You don’t want it to happen, but it’s part of life.
My faith has kept me strong in times of great distress and turmoil and has given me a touchstone with myself and more.
    [Life mag., Dec 2 2005]

> photo from piercebrosnan.com - which includes
a gallery of his paintings


> related page:. spirituality
> related article : Being Creative and Self-critical
- by Douglas Eby


~ ~ ~ ~

Idina Menzel on embracing your uniqueness

Everybody in some way or another can feel completely alienated and like an outcast...

When you’re an artist usually you have to take risks and usually you have to put yourself on the line and go against the grain in order to be great and unique.

And then you sort of stand up for what you believe and are able to resist the negativity and things people will say to you. So that’s one aspect of Elphaba.

We women have this strength inside of us and yet we are taught to always sort of keep it down.
If we’re too big or too angry or too bold or too beautiful or too talented, it can scare people. It might scare other women, it might scare men, whatever it is.

I sort of found in my life that I’ve taken a step back and made myself smaller in order to try to fit in.

And that hasn’t worked. And we have to learn to kind of embrace what makes us unique, and embrace our strength and then if people don’t like it, ** it.

Idina Menzel  [musicalschwartz.com
interview
]

photo at left [by Joan Marcus] - Idina Menzel [in her green makeup] and Kristin Chenoweth as Elphaba and Glinda in the Broadway musical “Wicked”

~ ~ ~ ~

    John Lennon & insecurity

People would be surprised at how insecure John Lennon was, and his lack of self esteem. This is a guy who did not have a father to speak of, a mother who disappeared, an aunt who was a disciplinarian, a failed first marriage...

Throughout his life, even during the height of Beatle mania, when they were so successful in the early days, he had poor self esteem.

And he told us that in his music: “I’m a loser... I’m not what I appear to be...”, “Help, I need somebody...”, “Mother, you had me but I didn’t have you.” ...

He had poor self esteem even though he exuded confidence.

> journalist and biographer Larry Kane [CNN Showbiz Tonight special on Lennon, Dec 8 2005]
. Kane
was the only American journalist to travel in the official Beatles entourage during the legendary 1964 and 1965 tours of North America.

> bio:
Lennon Revealed - by Larry Kane

~ ~ ~ ~

more perspectives of John Lennon

I'm not going to change the way I look or the way I feel to conform to anything. I've always been a freak.. all my life and I have to live with that, you know.

If being an egomaniac means I believe in what I do and in my art or music, then in that respect you can call me that...

The worst drugs are as bad as anybody's told you. It's just a dumb trip, which I can't condemn.. one gets into it for one's own personal, social, emotional reasons. It's something to be avoided if one can help it.
Part of me suspects that I'm a loser, and the other part of me thinks I'm God Almighty.

You're just left with yourself all the time, whatever you do anyway. You've got to get down to your own God in your own temple. It's all down to you, mate.

> quotes from brainyquote.com

> photo from book:
John Lennon : The New York Years
  
   > more on blog post:
talented & insecure

~ ~ ~ ~

    self-doubting / self sabotage

There is nothing more frustrating than getting to the verge of success then shooting ourselves in the foot.

It begins when the computer of oneself was being programmed at an early age, an incident or incidents happened that affected the way that we think about success.

Competition breeds self sabotage. Whenever we enter a competition, exam, contest we will project into a desired outcome. For example an outcome of winning a competition, or getting selected to represent our team, or winning a promotion.

Now supposing that outcome is not realized and someone else wins the prize or gets the promotion. What we are left with is our 'projection of success' not being realised.
This mental energy, which is what it actually is, turns to disappointment, then perhaps bitterness, if we do not resolve the outcome in ourselves.

This perhaps leads to the world view, that the world is unfair, that others get better opportunity than we do and so forth. If left unchecked this creates a perfect ecology for self sabotage.

We then start to think about ourselves as someone who doesn't get selected, win the promotions, make the big sales, and behave in a way, that confirms this view of ourselves. This is self sabotage. In the book, you can go through an exercise that will help you build an antidote to self sabotage.

Martin Perry - coach, and author of ebook
Supreme Confidence for Self Doubters

> more books:  self-esteem/concept resources





~ ~ ~ ~



Many creative people, even when they have achieved recognition for their talents, may experience self-critical thoughts and insecurity.

Talented film actors often report they don’t watch their own movies. When you can be seen in close-ups on twenty foot high theater screens, it may be especially hard not to criticize your appearance and performance.

Kate Winslet has admitted that before going off to a movie shoot, she sometimes thinks, “I’m a fraud, and they're going to fire me... I'm fat; I'm ugly.”

Highly creative and talented people are, according to research on giftedness, often susceptible to perfectionism
and unreasonably high standards and expectations that can lead to exaggerated criticism.

> article
Being Creative and Self-critical - by Douglas Eby

~ ~ ~ ~

You come to realise there is this huge disparity between what you think about yourself and your work and what other people think about you and your work, at first you either think they're insane or that it's a conspiracy to make you look stupid. Or maybe, just maybe, they're right, and you're sometimes quite good at what you do.

Bill Nighy .. [imdb.com bio]

> photo: Bill Nighy with Kelly Macdonald in HBO film The Girl in the Cafe



~ ~ ~ ~

I have varying degrees of confidence and self-loathing.... You can have a perfectly horrible day where you doubt your talent. It could be about not feeling able to achieve a certain scene or about an emotion you feel you weren't able to get to... Or that you're boring and they're going to find out that you don't know what you're doing... any one of those things.

Meryl Streep .. [The Sunday Times Magazine, October 2004]
> photo as Sen. Eleanor Shaw in The Manchurian Candidate (2004, Paramount)

> related page :...impostor syndrome.


~ ~ ~ ~

imageIn her 13th summer, Jane Fonda began seriously hating her own body.

(This "disembodiment" resulted in bulimia... and an addiction to Dexedrine that persisted well into Fonda's 40s. It was not until [after 1997], she writes, that she was able to "reinhabit" her body.)

She.. attended Vassar College, but she dropped out and convinced her father to send her to Paris to study painting.

This was a time of deep depression, "an existential mourning for the lack of meaning in my life, a yearning for the emergence of an authentic self I wasn't sure existed," she writes. ///

"All my life," she writes in the final chapter, titled "Leaving My Father's House," "I had been a father's daughter … seeing myself through the eyes of men and accommodating them on the deepest, invisible level (while seeming to do the contrary) and, in so doing, delivering a part of myself to a world that bifurcates head and heart."

Why didn't she become a feminist sooner?

"I erroneously thought it required male bashing," she writes.

> from review by Susan Salter Reynolds
[LA Times April 5, 2005] of Jane Fonda's memoir
My Life So Far

.

~ ~ ~ ~

The Enchanted Self

When I first began to analyze data from the women I interviewed, I kept trying to understand how their enhanced adult lives evolved from the childhoods they talked about. 

I found that although there seemed to be some clear connections, many others were not clear at all. This mystery further influenced my choice of the The Enchanted Self as a term to express these positive ego-states. 

The capacities of these women to re-claim positive aspects of their childhood, while discarding the dysfunction that was often also present, was astounding to me.

It seemed as if a magic wand had been tapped on the women's heads in their adult lives.

For example, when Edith talked about her childhood, she at first remembered only its dysfunctional aspects: the fighting between her parents and their constant criticality.

I suggested that we go back and look again at her childhood to identify times when, in spite of the pain of family life, she felt excited about her own life and about herself. ....

The magic was that the adult Edith could integrate the overly functional, meticulous child she once was into an enormously competent professional woman who gained positive self-esteem and gratification from her abilities.

She even found the time to develop her talent for dancing.

Thus Edith's enchanted self in adulthood was really the successful integration of the compulsive traits created by negative childhood experiences, with old pleasures and new talents.

Dr. Barbara Becker Holstein - from her book 
The Enchanted Self : A Positive Therapy -

available on her site The Enchanted Self

> also see her article Practical Steps to Enchantment

...

~ ~ ~ ~

.
Lauren Bacall refers often to her insecurity -- it is the curse of actors (and particularly herself) to need the approval of strangers -- but to her credit, she gets out there and does the work.

"For the real stakes in the theatre are high -- they are life stakes," she says.

Her successes have been darkened with much more pain: "At the age of twenty I had grabbed at the sky and had touched some stars. And who but a twenty-year-old would think you could keep it?" ///

"I'm hanging in," Bacall says in summary. Work "keeps me in high spirit."

Her self-confidence is improved "if still a bit shaky." Critics' opinions can never be completely ignored, but "what really matters is that I matter to myself."

> from review by Eric Lax [LA Times Feb 27, 2005]
of Lauren Bacall's memoir
By Myself and Then Some

.

~ ~ ~ ~


I think what became more important to me was not how other people saw me but how I saw myself. I do run a company. I am consistent at work. My bosses think that I will show up on time, and I'm reliable to them.

I can respect myself. That ended up becoming the important journey for me. And, of course, I'll always be a bit of a ridiculous clown, 'cause I just can't help it.

Drew Barrymore
> from True Drew - by Nancy Juvonen, Glamour, Mar 2004
photos - left : Lester Cohen/WireImage // right : Eddie Adams


 
~ ~ ~ ~  
 
On the other hand, the most creative and morally advanced people are typically not models of high self-esteem.

But this insecurity is usually a sign of an active conscience at work. Moreover, the insecurity and the demons it feeds, are necessary elements of a creative temperament and we have plenty of evidence that without them no meaningful creative efforts, especially in art, can be undertaken.

Czeslaw Milosz, Polish poet and writer, and a Nobel laureate, who died this year, attested to this, when he confessed: “From early on writing for me has been a way to overcome my real or imagined worthlessness”. Imagine that.


..
..
There remains something positive to be said about not feeling too comfortable with oneself. Perhaps all great human endeavors have at their root feelings of inferiority.

> from article What Is Wrong With Feeling Good
by Elizabeth Mika


 
~ ~ ~ ~
 
I read the script [for "Garden State"] and it was like no other part I'd had the opportunity to play, someone so uninhibited and unreserved and lets all her flaws shine. 

That was really exciting to do, and liberating. I'm a pretty inhibited person myself. I try not to be, but years of adolescence train you to be embarrassed about everything that's weird about you... A lot of what this movie's about is how can you be different and find your unique place in the world.

Natalie Portman   ... LA Times August 2, 2004 /  Garden State [dvd]

~ ~ ~ ~

 

..
..
I still doubt myself every single day. ... What people believe is my self-confidence is actually my reaction to fear. ... 

I've always had a horrible fear of not achieving. I think that comes from my relationship with my mother and especially my grandmother, who believed I could do anything. She held me in such high esteem that I never wanted to fail her. She and my mother were central in my life. ///

I've learned to use [self-doubt and fear of failure], to flip that negative energy around and make it a challenge. 

I keep going because I doubt myself. It drives me to be better. I've learned that the mastery of self-doubt is the key to success.

It's like being animated by the love of a woman -- the need to be worthy of her. That's the spot Jada holds in my life. I have to be better, stronger for her. It makes me excel.

Will Smith

from "My Fear Fuels Me" - By Dotson Rader, 
Parade, July 11, 2004


~ ~ ~ ~
 
believe in yourself 

[Do you have any advice for young actresses?]

You have to believe in yourself and not just what other people say. I remember walking through the streets of New York, being a waitress and not even at the point of pursuing it. 

Just mailing my headshots out, walking around and thinking, "Why am I trying to be an actress? The odds are so against me. Why am I trying to do this?" 

But something inside of me just kept doing it. I think something inside of me just believed that this is what I should do.

Not that I was trying to be some movie star, but that I would try to have a career at this. I guess just believe in yourself and take the risks. You know that's what it is really. It's really risky.

Kim Dickens... [Venice magazine April 1998] 
photo : as Joanie Stubbs in HBO series "Deadwood"


 
~ ~ ~ ~
 
Life is not easy for any of us. But what of that? We must have perseverance and, above all, confidence in ourselves. We must believe that we are gifted for something, and that this something, at whatever cost, must be attained.

Marie Curie... [quoted in Personal Success newsletter from Brian Tracy Int'l]

> related book : Obsessive Genius : The Inner World of Marie Curie by Barbara Goldsmith

  
~ ~ ~ ~
 
At times, I feel like my life is one long coming-out process. The first time I shared a part of my life with someone else, it wasn't pleasant. 

As a five-year-old, living in a rickety farmhouse in a conservative Midwestern suburb, I invited a friend over to make cookies. Later she told me she didn't want to play with me anymore. 

Why? Our cookie sheets were not shiny -- they were burned. I had unwittingly come out to her as a poor girl.

After the cookie sheet fiasco, I would have liked to stifle our family's eccentricities, but I knew we had too many of them. 

I had a freaky physicist dad who cried at the drop of a hat, a hippie artist sister; we lived with my strident feminist grandmother and sulky grandfather, and later we lived with my lesbian mother and her partner. 

Eccentric example: in junior high, my girlfriends' mothers were teaching them how to shave their legs and armpits. 

Meantime, my mother begged me not to shave, reminding me that I would miss this expression of my full woman-inity, or whatever she called it.

It wasn't just my family; I had my own eccentric pursuits. As a teenager attending a picture-perfect high school on Chicago's North Shore,


..
..
I stayed up late doing symbolic logic puzzles, started an underground newspaper, created an activist student group and attended conferences about nuclear proliferation.

Writing about these geeky adventures now, I realize I'm proud of them.

I guess I spent many of my early years learning a difficult lesson: when you know for sure that you can't blend in, you realize you also can't pass as normal. 

You can either truly honor your uniqueness or invalidate yourself.

Julia Mossbridge - from her article Spirituality for Geeks
Conscious Choice, March 2004

> book: Julia Mossbridge. Unfolding

*related pages:.......eccentricity........early life

   ~ ~ ~ ~

 

..
..
Too often women see themselves through the eyes of those who devalue their contributions, and many blindly accept the myth that we are not supposed to direct our lives with courage.

Allowing these concepts to flourish is to deceive ourselves as to our true value and potential.

If we hold the assumption that we cannot change things, we will live our lives reacting to other instead of taking action ourselves.


..
..
By reclaiming a courageous self-image that is based on concrete information, we can bring about positive change and move from resignation to the excitement of making self-rewarding choices.

Sandra Ford Walston     [site]

....Courage: The Heart and Spirit of Every Woman : 
Reclaiming the Forgotten Virtue

...
~ ~ ~ ~
...
Another kid had been killed in a car crash. He was driving alone and drunk. I understood it in an odd kind of way. We don't really value our own lives. Most of the kids in Maplewood were unhappy and felt insignificant (me included), but along with this feeling that we were insignificant we had this overblown opinion of ourselves. 

Nothing could happen to us. We were beyond it. Above and below. I was the same way. It could have been me except I was too busy being crazy in other ways.

....Thelma, age 14, from the novel Crazy Eights by Barbara Dana (1978)
[image: detail of book cover illustration by Robert J. Blake]

...
~ ~ ~ ~
...

..
..
I play true to my heart, because I have been an outsider my whole life simply by being a woman of African American, Native American, Filipino, Chinese and Spanish descent, I know what it is like to be stereotyped and defamed without people knowing my character. ...

[To consistently play an outsider, you have to have a 
pretty strong will. Where does your strength come from?]

My grandfather always wanted us to be self-sufficient, especially the girls in the family. 

He taught us to drive the speedboat, to fish and hunt, to survive in the wilderness.. to take care of ourselves. 

I always saw rural families teaching their women; city families protected their women and didn't teach them very much. ....


..
..
Eventually Bob Vila came into our lives, and taught women how to pick up a hammer and screwdriver. He's been my idol ever since! ....

[My character in The L Word] is evolving, and so am I. Whoever we are [as people] is not concrete.

Pam Grier

from article: She's Here, She's Grier 
by Denise Sheppard, BUST winter 2003]

photos: left: unknown date; 
right in Showtime series The L Word (2004)

...
*related pages:.......courage/confidence........identity

   ~ ~ ~ ~

...
Self Limiting High Potential Persons.. etch enduring pathways over time by repeating their characteristic self-defeating methods... this tendency can evolve into a general self-limiting style. .... 

  one of the styles : Sleepers. The style most often seen in people from families or communities without models or traditions of high achievement. Sleepers lack accurate information about themselves, the extent of their talent, and ways to express it. ... 

more styles: Extreme Non-Risk-Takers ; Delayers ; Charmers ; Self-Doubters / Self-Attackers ; Extreme Risk-Takers ; Rebels ; Misunderstood Geniuses ; Best-or-Nothings

....Your Own Worst Enemy: Breaking the Habit of Adult Underachievement - 
by Kenneth W. Christian, PhD

more styles listed on page :  self-limiting behavior

.....
~ ~ ~ ~
...
You are usually your own worst enemy. It's a classic Catch-22. You cannot truly create something great unless you are willing to share your tenderest, most vulnerable thoughts and feelings.

Yet, once you do that, you may be racked with self-doubt and fear. Few artists are able to accurately assess just how valuable and great their work is -- or how much it will be appreciated by its audience.

In other words, insecurity is the name ofthe game.

Suzanne Falter-Barns - from her article Coaching Creativity: 7 Lessons From Artists

...her books: 
How Much Joy Can You Stand : A Creative Guide to Facing 
Your Fears and Making Your Dreams Come True

Living Your Joy: A Practical Guide to Happiness

her site:
HowMuchJoy.com - practical tools for creative dreamers
...
~ ~ ~ ~
....
.......

more :***self-esteem / self concept.: page 2..........self-esteem / self concept.: page 3

...................self-esteem / self concept.: page 4......... 

..self-esteem / self concept resources : sites articles books.........change / growth sites
*related pages:.........courage/confidence..........identity..........ego / narcissism..........androgyny..........eccentricity

  ****home page  :: Talent Development Resources*----**site contents******books etc

*******sections:---Women & Talent ------Teen / Young Adult talent




 
+ نوشته شده در  پنجشنبه بیست و یکم اردیبهشت 1385ساعت 11:45  توسط علی  | 

CHAPTER X.
The Consciousness of Self.

Let us begin with the Self in its widest acceptation, and follow it up to its most delicate and subtle form, advancing from the study of the empirical, as the Germans call it, to that of the pure, Ego. 

The Empirical Self or Me.

The Empirical Self of each of us is all that he is tempted to call by the name of me. But it is clear that between what a man calls me and what he simply calls mine the line is difficult to draw. We feel and act about certain things that are ours very much as we feel and act about ourselves. Our fame, our children, the work of our hands, may be as dear to us as our bodies are, and arouse the same feelings and the same acts of reprisal if attacked. And our bodies themselves, are they simply ours, or are they us? Certainly men have been ready to disown their very bodies and to regard them as mere vestures, or even as prisons of clay from which they should some day be glad to escape.

We see then that we are dealing with a fluctuating material. The same object being sometimes treated as a part of me, at other times as simply mine, and then again as if I had nothing to do with it at all. In its widest possible sense, however, a man's Self is the sum total of all that he CAN call his, not only his body and his psychic powers, but his clothes and his house, his wife and children, his ancestors and friends, his reputation and works, his lands and horses, and yacht and bank-account. All these things give him the same emotions. If they wax and prosper, he feels triumphant; if they dwindle and die away, he feels cast down, - not necessarily in the same degree for each [p. 292] thing, but in much the same way for all. Understanding the Self in this widest sense, we may begin by dividing the history of it into three parts, relating respectively to -

1. Its constituents;
2. The feelings and emotions they arouse, -- Self-feelings;
3. The actions to which they prompt, -- Self-seeking and Self-preservation.

1. The constituents of the Self may be divided into two classes, those which make up respectively -

(a) The material Self;
(b) The social Self;
(c) The spiritual Self; and
(d) The pure Ego.

(a) The body is the innermost part of the material Self in each of us; and certain parts of the body seem more intimately ours than the rest. The clothes come next. The old saying that the human person is composed of three parts - soul, body and clothes - is more than a joke. We so appropriate our clothes and identify ourselves with them that there are few of us who, if asked to choose between having a beautiful body clad in raiment perpetually shabby and unclean, and having an ugly and blemished form always spotlessly attired, would not hesitate a moment before making a decisive reply.[1] Next, our immediate family is a part of ourselves. Our father and mother, our wife and babes, are bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh. When they die, a part of our very selves is gone. If they do anything wrong, it is our shame. If they are insulted, our anger flashes forth as readily as if we stood in their place. Our home comes next. Its scenes are part of our life; its aspects awaken the tenderest feelings of affection; and we do not easily forgive the stranger who, in visiting it, finds fault with its arrangements or treats it with contempt. All these different things are the objects of instinctive preferences coupled with the most important practical interests of life. We all have a blind impulse to watch over our body, to deck it with clothing of [p. 293] an ornamental sort, to cherish parents, wife and babes, and to find for ourselves a home of our own which we may live in and 'improve.'

An equally instinctive impulse drives us to collect property; and the collections thus made become, with different degrees of intimacy, parts of our empirical selves. The parts of our wealth most intimately ours are those which are saturated with our labor. There are few men who would not feel personally annihilated if a life-long construction of their hands or brains - say an entomological collection or an extensive work in manuscript - were suddenly swept away. The miser feels similarly towards his gold, and although it is true that a part of our depression at the loss of possessions is due to our feeling that we must now go without certain goods that we expected the possessions to bring in their train, yet in every case there remains, over and above this, a sense of the shrinkage of our personality, a partial conversion of ourselves to nothingness, which is a psychological phenomenon by itself. We are all at once assimilated to the tramps and poor devils whom we so despise, and at the same time removed farther than ever away from the happy sons of earth who lord it over land and sea and men in the full-blown lustihood that wealth and power can give, and before whom, stiffen ourselves as we will by appealing to anti-snobbish first principles, we cannot escape an emotion, open or sneaking, of respect and dread.

(b) A man's Social Self is the recognition which he gets from his mates. We are not only gregarious animals, liking to be in sight of our fellows, but we have an innate propensity to get ourselves noticed, and noticed favorably, by our kind. No more fiendish punishment could be devised, were such a thing physically possible, than that one should be turned loose in society and remain absolutely unnoticed by all the members thereof. If no one turned round when we entered, answered when we spoke, or minded what we did, but if every person we met 'cut us dead,' and acted as if we were non-existing things, a kind of rage and impotent despair would ere long well up in us, from which the [p. 294] cruellest bodily tortures would be a relief; for these would make us feel that, however bad might be our plight, we had not sunk to such a depth as to be unworthy of attention at all.

Properly speaking, a man has as many social selves as there are individuals who recognize him and carry an image of him in their mind. To wound any one of these his images is to wound him.[2] But as the individuals who carry the images fall naturally into classes, we may practically say that he has as many different social selves as there are distinct groups of persons about whose opinion he cares. He generally shows a different side of himself to each of these different groups. Many a youth who is demure enough before his parents and teachers, swears and swaggers like a pirate among his 'tough' young friends. We do not show ourselves to our children as to our club-companions, to our customers as to the laborers we employ, to our own masters and employers as to our intimate friends. From this there results what practically is a division of the man into several selves; and this may be a discordant splitting, as where one is afraid to let one set of his acquaintances know him as he is elsewhere; or it may be a perfectly harmonious division of labor, as where one tender to his children is stern to the soldiers or prisoners under his command.

The most peculiar social self which one is apt to have is in the mind of the person one is in love with. The good or bad fortunes of this self cause the most intense elation and dejection - unreasonable enough as measured by every other standard than that of the organic feeling of the individual. To his own consciousness he is not, so long as this particular social self fails to get recognition, and when it is recognized his contentment passes all bounds.

A man's fame, good or bad, and his honor or dishonor, are names for one of his social selves. The particular social self of a man called his honor is usually the result of one of those splittings of which we have spoken. It is his image in the eyes of his own 'set,' which exalts or con- [p. 295] demns him as he conforms or not to certain requirements that may not be made of one in another walk of life. Thus a layman may abandon a city infected with cholera; but a priest or a doctor would think such an act incompatible with his honor. A soldier's honor requires him to fight or to die under circumstances where another man can apologize or run away with no stain upon his social self. A judge, a statesman, are in like manner debarred by the honor of their cloth from entering into pecuniary relations perfectly honorable to persons in private life. Nothing is commoner than to hear people discriminate between their different selves of this sort: "As a man I pity you, but as an official I must show you no mercy; as a politician I regard him as an ally, but as a moralist I loathe him;" etc., etc. What may be called 'club-opinion' is one of the very strongest forces in life.[3] The thief must not steal from other thieves; the gambler must pay his gambling-debts, though he pay no other debts in the world. The code of honor of fashionable society has throughout history been full of permissions as well as of vetoes, the only reason for following either of which is that so we best serve one of [p. 296] our social selves. You must not lie in general, but you may lie as much as you please if asked about your relations with a lady; you must accept a challenge from an equal, but if challenged by an inferior you may laugh him to scorn: these are examples of what is meant.

(c) By the Spiritual Self, so far as it belongs to the Empirical Me, I mean a man's inner or subjective being, his psychic faculties or dispositions, taken concretely; not the bare principle of personal Unity, or 'pure' Ego, which remains still to be discussed. These psychic dispositions are the most enduring and intimate part of the self, that which we most verily seem to be. We take a purer self-satisfaction when we think of our ability to argue and discriminate, of our moral sensibility and conscience, of our indomitable will, than when we survey any of our other possessions. Only when these are altered is a man said to be alienatus a se.

+ نوشته شده در  پنجشنبه چهاردهم اردیبهشت 1385ساعت 11:15  توسط علی  |